60-Second Science

New York City's Big Smoking Decline

Between 2002 and 2006, New York City's rate of smokers went down by 20 percent. Analysts credit tobacco taxes, workplace smoking prohibitions and a major ad campaign. Steve Mirsky reports. For more info, go to www.cdc.gov/mmwr














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

June 22, 2007  New York City's Big Smoking Decline

You know there’s a zillion reasons not to smoke.  Here’s one more.  A new study in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research found that smoking interferes with ligament healing after injury.  Anyway, one place where people apparently are getting the no smoking message is New York City.  Between 2002 and 2006, the city saw its smoking rate go down by 20 percent.  That’s about a quarter million fewer smoking New Yorkers.  That left only 17.5 percent of the city still smoking, which is a lower rate than 45 states have. 

All these figures appear in an article in the newest issue of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Report.  It’s available online at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/.

What prompted the decline?  After a decade-long lack of progress, in 2002 the city increased the tobacco tax, prohibited smoking in most workplaces and launched a major ad campaign.  Although the Bronx, Manhattan and Queens have all seen more than a 20 percent drop in smoking, Staten Island’s rate remained virtually unchanged.  Well, a lot of people think Staten Island should really be part of New Jersey.  


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

New York City's Big Smoking Decline

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X