60-Second Science

Google-Style Rankings for Ecosystems

Using Google's ranking system--pages are important based on how many other pages link to them--ecologists can figure out which species really hold an ecosystem together. Adam Hinterthuer reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Since so many species in a food web are interconnected, the demise of a one can mean extinction for several others that depend on it for food. Thanks to things like climate change and habitat destruction, this "bottom-up extinction" has ecologists scrambling to save key species. Stefano Allesino says they may just want to Google the problem.

Speaking on August 4th at the Ecological Society of America's annual conference, Allesino outlined a new way to rank the species of an ecosystem. Google uses a complicated algorithm to rank Web pages that best match a query. Basically, a single webpage ranks low, but rises in importance if a handful of other pages link to it. The highest ranked sites have thousands of these well-connected pages linked to them.

Inspired by this system, Allesino’s formula gives importance to a species if it supplies food to another. And, if that species serves as food for several organisms, it climbs up the rankings. Higher ranked species, says Allesino, should become the focus of conservation efforts. And that means there's finally a perk to being the foundation of the food web.

—Adam Hinterthuer

 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes 


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Jim Fisher 08:04 PM 8/20/08

    I don't know, or care really, what species hold together which ecosystem. What matters today is that one species, ours, has pushed the planetary ecosystem well past the brink and continues to push as hard as it can. There have been, according to whichever paper you read, seven or so mass extinctions in the history of life on Earth. Welcome to number eight. The chances that anything saving can be done to stop the Inevetable are very slim, probably non-existant. Sorry to be such a drag, but the time has come, as the walrus said, to speak of other things. Like, can we save the best of art, science and technology for the survivors? What can we do to make the collapse as painless for the billions that will most surely die?

    To be blunt: The shit has hit the fan, kiddies. It's time to get real.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Google-Style Rankings for Ecosystems

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X