More 60-Second Science
You’d think an animal that hops would know how to land. But for a kind of frog, that’s not the case. Imagine trying to catch a frog. You reach and they jump, only to land gracefully on their feet a few feet away.
It was thought that all frogs moved this way. They'd push off with their back legs, and then once in flight, rotate the limbs forward. Then they landed fore-limbs first. But researchers compared frogs of the family Leiopelmatidae, which still sport an ancient physiology, to two more modern frog species. Unlike their more graceful cousins, the primitive frogs kept their back legs straight out after they jumped. So they don’t land on their feet. Instead, they do an ungainly belly flop, and then struggle to get to their feet and jump again. The finding is in the journal Naturwissenschaften. [Richard Essner et al., http://bit.ly/9Nk4FH]
The scientists say that the back-leg push-off must have evolved first, with the ability to rotate and land softly evolving later. Although the bad landers are still around, their more controlled relatives appear to be better at making longer trips, foraging for food and, most importantly, avoiding other animals that have an interest in frog legs—for dinner.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about




3 Comments
Add CommentSo can we infer that some crickets, those that often also land ungracefully on their back or sides, must have developed their ability to jump rather recently?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt's like the old joke, "When is a cricket not a frog?"
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWell, uh, yeah, duh, why would they master the ability to land if they couldn't even jump yet?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOf course the ability to jump would've evolved first giving the proto-frogs higher odds of survival, after which those frogs who could jump and steer their bodies for successive jumps would have even higher odds of survival.