60-Second Health

Biological Clock Ticks Despite Technology

Women who wish to conceive later in life have benefited from improvements in reproductive technology. But even those have expiration dates. Katherine Harmon reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

More and more women are waiting longer to start a family, thanks to widely available family planning and changing social norms. These days at least one in 12 women has their first child after the age of 35.

As natural fertility declines through a woman's 30s and 40s, many are turning to in vitro fertilization, or IVF. In the last decade, the number of women over 40 who used IVF jumped more than 41 percent. With news of women giving birth after 60, fertility seems almost indefinite.

But IVF and other reproductive technologies cannot extend a woman's baby-bearing abilities forever. Even the success of assisted reproduction drops off dramatically after 40. So says a report in the journal Fertility and Sterility. [Nichole Wyndham, Paula Gabriela Marin Figueira and Pasquale Patrizio, "A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the 'aged biological clock'"]

Many much-older mothers have become pregnant with donated eggs, rather than their own. The study notes that one solution for women who wish to delay pregnancy is to freeze their own eggs years ahead of time. 

But when family planning for the long term, it might be wise to realize that even the stork eventually gets too old to fly.

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. LordDraqo 12:14 PM 4/12/12

    I remember when Kaity had her blood-work done, while pregnant with Eleanor. Though she was over 45, her blood-work was congruent with that of a 20something, in terms of how it would effect her pregnancy. So while there IS a biological clock, it may be set differently for different people.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ASHIK 09:14 AM 4/13/12

    I want my wife to conceive in early 30's.Its an ideal age to have babies.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Biological Clock Ticks Despite Technology

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X