60-Second Earth

Can Energy Labels Be Trusted?

Just how good is the Energy Star label? David Biello reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Gadgets and energy are a big problem. Just by failing to shut down computers overnight, U.S. workers waste some $2.8 billion worth of electricity. Our love affair with the Internet ends up emitting 2 percent of global carbon dioxide—roughly the same amount as air travel.

Fortunately, there's Energy Star, a program from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that sets standards for how much energy a given gadget can use. For example, in order to qualify for the blue and white logo a laptop must use 1.7 watts or less in sleep mode.

According to a new report by the EPA's Inspector General (pdf), an in-house watchdog, Energy Star approves mostly products that meet its standards: 100 percent of DVD players tested, 100 percent of monitors tested and 95 percent of the printers tested.

Unfortunately, however, some products that aren't Energy Star labeled, such as certain DVD players, perform "comparably to, and in some cases better than Energy Star products." And EPA itself does very little testing of gadgets. So did Energy Star really save 180 billion kilowatt-hours for consumers in 2007?

The solution is for EPA to begin testing all products to ensure that the ones that qualify as Energy Star really are the most energy efficient and cost-effective choice, and to make sure that those bearing the brand live up to the hype.

—David Biello


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. kam123 11:34 AM 12/4/09

    The amount that your suggestion would cost the government is inconceivable. There are over 60 product categories, and even more being developed. The reason that ENERGY STAR partners haven't been asked to test their products until recently is because the costs associated with testing products are so high. Are you really proposing that instead of asking partners, who are socially and economically benefiting from the brand, to pay you would like taxpayer dollars to fund this varification? The focus must be placed on having EPA mandate third party testing occur before partners submit products for ENERGY STAR qualification.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Can Energy Labels Be Trusted?

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X