60-Second Earth

Carbon Dioxide from Cars

U.S. states are beginning to attack another major source of global warming pollution besides power plants: your car. David Biello reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

Cars in California offer a new kind of sticker shock this year: carbon. In addition to the familiar smog ratings, labels on new Cali cars rank them 1 to 10 based on greenhouse gas emissions.

The best, a perfect 10, will emit less than 200 grams of greenhouse gases per mile. The bad ones more than 520.

Vermont will also begin offering the labels next year. And the 11 states that compose the northeastern region of the U.S. are also attacking the problem at the source: fuel. The states plan to develop new standards for biofuels and other alternatives that will reduce the greenhouse gases emitted when burned in a car, a furnace or a factory. 

These states already cooperate in a cap-and-trade scheme to limit the carbon dioxide emitted by power plants. Other regions, including California and other western states, are copying that plan.

U.S. power plants released roughly 2.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2007 generating our electricity. But our vehicles were the second largest source of America’s greenhouse gases. Tailpipes spewed out 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide from burning gasoline.

The easy-to-interpret labels—10 is great, 1 is bad—aim to change that.  By reminding us to keep emissions in mind next time we buy a car.

—David Biello

60-Second Earth is a weekly podcast from Scientific American. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes


7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. peanutbutter 07:10 AM 1/10/09

    now, how is this supposed to get people to stop driving gas cars? Thats like putting the fat content on pizza... People don't care. All they want is to go fast and eat food with flavor.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. sy0591 01:57 AM 1/11/09

    123

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. randydutton 05:17 PM 1/13/09

    CO2 Deficit: Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are 80% lower than 170 million years ago when life flourished. It has been a linear decline since then with only a slight uptick in the past 200 years. At the current 280ppm we are near the 180ppm nadir of CO2 concentrations over 570 million years, and if mankind is successful in sequestering this life-essential gas down to about 150ppm, nearly all plantlife on Earth will die. Before we get to that point, agriculture yields will decline, and many beneficial species will disappear. Studies show CO2 is absolutely necessary to life, and increases plant growth significantly at higher concentrations. We should be thankful that increased CO2 has benefited agriculture and plant life over the past couple centuries. There is a finite quantity of carbon on Earth. Much of it has been naturally sequestered deep underground as peat, coal, gas, and oil. Some has been absorbed as carbonates. And much of that is now inaccessible. We have released some of it during fuel burning and making cement, but we also increase the CO2 absorption with lakes, excavation, and erosion.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. karlchwe 12:21 AM 1/14/09

    randydutton is a crackpot, a shill for big oil, or a moron.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. mmorgan 10:25 AM 1/14/09

    Why do you continue to promote this myth of Global Warming when there is a considerable amount of data that shows we are about to enter a period of Global Cooling? God, I'm glad I cancelled my subscription to this rag.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. swink 10:24 AM 8/8/09

    what is the formula that calculates that 19 lbs. of co2 are emitted from the burning of one (1) gallon of gasoline?
    I am curious since this more than double the weight of the gasoline.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. RickJames in reply to swink 01:18 AM 8/9/09

    well swink, Your car uses two tanks. The gas tank and the atmosphere, which is much a much bigger tank than the one with gas in it. The reaction that produces CO2 requires oxygen from the atmosphere so that is where the extra weight comes from.

    Also CO2 ratings on cars are dumb. The more gas it burns, the more CO2 - that is all you need to know.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Carbon Dioxide from Cars

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X