60-Second Tech

Cybersecurity Threats to Pick Up Steam in 2012

A new Georgia Tech Information Security Center report cites search engines, mobile phones and personal information as prime targets for hackers. Larry Greenemeier reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

This year has had its share of cybersecurity bombshells. Cybersecurity vendor McAfee revealed widespread theft of government data over the past five years. Now the hacker group Anonymous has threatened to take down the New York Stock Exchange's computers .

Expect more of the same in 2012, maybe even worse. So says a new report (pdf) from the Georgia Tech Information Security Center.

So-called search poisoning will emerge. That's where a cyber attacker inserts a virus or spyware into your search results.

Beware of Mobile Web-based attacks as well. Mobile phones have always been relatively insecure. Now that so many people use them to surf the Web and store sensitive data, they've become a prime target for hackers.

The Georgia Tech report also cautions against the use of hijacked computers, called botnets, to steal personal information from your online accounts and then sell that info to marketers.

Your best defense is common sense. Update your passwords and antivirus software regularly. And play it safe when surfing the Web from your phone. Stick with app stores and other sites you know and trust. 

—Larry Greenemeier


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Forsythkid 08:30 PM 10/15/11

    I've never been sure if these companies that sell hacker protection software are not also the cause of the problem as well. Call me paranoid.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. plswinford in reply to Forsythkid 04:15 PM 10/18/11

    It makes sense that those renting out the fire brigades would make more money if they also set fires.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Quinn the Eskimo 11:05 PM 10/18/11

    Is that prediction anything like; "2012 to have hurricanes! Insurance recommended."?

    Cuz, like I'm really curious.


    .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. bucketofsquid 12:56 PM 10/28/11

    It is unfortunate that this brief article includes the catastrophically wrong admonishment to change passwords arbitrarily. Having a solid, hard to guess password is far better than changing passwords regularly. You should only change passwords if you know or suspect yours has been compromised. Let me give an example;

    Joe Public regularly changes his password. This means either his passwords have to be easy to remember or guess because otherwise he will forget or he must write the password down so the cleaning crew or co-worker at work or a friend or family member at home can find and read it, thus destroying it's value. If he doesn't write it down he probably is using a pet name or family member name or favorite phrase. Anyone that knows him can probably figure it out after a few tries.

    Let us suppose someone figures out his password. He eventually changes it so they go through the same process and in a matter of minutes or a day or two they have his new password. Maybe he uses good patterns for his password so it is harder to guess this time. Think he is safe? Nope. The person compromising his security implanted a root key and included a key logger so every time he changes passwords the new password is sent to the hacker scum and changing it has no impact or benefit at all.

    You should use a different password for entertainment than you use for important transactions such as pharmacy or financial activity but changing passwords decreases security a lot. I've used the same password for important things for 8 years with no trouble.

    A network admin friend of mine that changes his every month has been hacked 3 times so far this year. Which is the more secure option?

    PS. My password is based on the name of a character from a book that I no longer remember the title or author of. I only have to remember 1 thing - the actual name of the character modified to meet secure password standards. Eight years of security and counting. It doesn't hurt to avoid porn sites either.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. GAry 7 02:18 PM 11/13/11

    ,,,or one could use a computer that doesn't have Active X controls, which is the easiest means of entry to your computer and is on all Micro soft systems.

    You can guess which computer system is therefore immune,,,

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Cybersecurity Threats to Pick Up Steam in 2012

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X