60-Second Mind

Digging Deeper into the Entire Brain

A recent paper in the journal Nature finally brings some vindication to fMRI, one of the most popular methods used to study the brain. Christie Nicholson reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has allowed scientists to watch areas of the brain “light up” in response to various stimuli. And this has told them about where in the brain certain responses reside—like where fear resides. But fMRI has limitations. The lighting up of certain brain regions leads to increased blood flow to active areas, and this is what you see in an fMRI image. But scientists only knew this as a correlation, not causation—meaning they weren’t sure if increased blood flow happened because neurons were firing.  


But a study published today in Nature has finally brought vindication. Using a technique called optogenetics, they were able to turn on genetically engineered brain cells in rats using a blue light delivered directly to those cells via an optic fiber. And then they put the rats in an fMRI and saw that the blood flow indeed matched precisely those excited cells. This shows that neural excitation is what produces the fMRI images of active brain areas.

 

Being able to control individual neurons with light has not only justified fMRI, but has opened up an entirely new way to study the brain. Optogenetics works at micro scale, and fMRI covers wide regions of the brain—together this means that scientists have a way to intervene and experiment with entire brain circuits, to finally see how a certain type of brain cell affects the wider global activity of the entire brain.

 

—Christie Nicholson

 

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. bangmather 11:29 PM 5/17/10

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging is related to the blood flow.Optogentics works at micro scale open a door which goes through the brain research

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. docpluta 04:47 PM 5/19/10

    Sounds like we now can see that neural activy increases blood flow, however it does not prove the inverse. Blood may still flow without any neural activity. this what we need to message, is there always neural activty when there is blood flow.

    This is such a simple anaylsis that optogentics will not be proof enough that bloood flow always signifies neuronal activty.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Digging Deeper into the Entire Brain

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X