60-Second Science

Does fMRI See the Future?

In a study published in the journal Nature, researchers find that functional magnetic resonance imaging may measure not only what the brain is doing, but what it is about to do. Karen Hopkin reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

For decades, scientists have used an imaging technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, to chronicle the brain in action. But a study in the January 22nd issue of Nature suggests that fMRI might show more than what the brain is doing—it might reveal what the brain’s about to do.

FMRI studies assume that blood flow in the brain correlates with neuronal activity. Active brain cells need nutrients, which are brought to the cells by freshly oxygenated blood. But in the new study, scientists found that fMRI also detects increased blood flow in brain regions that aren’t active—but that may be in the near future.

The researchers trained monkeys to perform a specific visual task. And they found that, even when the animals were sitting in the dark waiting for the test to begin, fMRI nevertheless revealed an increased blood flow to the monkeys’ visual cortex.

The study suggests that fMRI data may be a lot more interesting than we thought. Scientists may be looking at their imaging data in a way that’s too simplistic. And fMRI may not be measuring exactly what we thought it did. What will they think of next? Maybe fMRI can tell.

—Karen Hopkin 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes 


8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. EvolveOrDie 10:12 AM 1/22/09

    Well, better said, does the brain see the future? :)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. EvolveOrDie 10:14 AM 1/22/09

    Or, can the brain be predicted? According to recent research articles, it is. :)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Briggsbio 11:00 AM 1/22/09

    I tend to disagree with the assertion that fMRI in this study was actually purporting future brain activity. I think the authors are grossly misrepresenting, although not intentionally, the data. Just because the monkeys were sitting in the dark does not mean that the visual cortex lay dormant. Think about every night when you are about to go to sleep. Flip the light off, crawl into bed, and your eyes try their hardest to adjust to the blackness--your visual cortex was probably even working harder than usual to parse images in the absence of light. It will be interesting to read their defense of this phenomena in their article. I am highly suspect that fMRI can "see the future" as the authors purport.
    -

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. alphachapmtl 11:14 AM 1/22/09

    The brain may be busy planning future activities, but the fMRI still only sees what the brain is currently doing, not what it's about to do (unless it's already doing it).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Psychology Student 76 07:23 PM 1/22/09

    This article is a bit misrepresenting. The fMRI does only see what the brain is doing currently. There could be several reasons why the monkey's visual cortex was active before the test was presented to them. One could be as Briggsbio stated. Or what I think is that if the monkey's have become conditioned to taking such visual tests, they will be anticipating the test, thus activating their visual cortex to prepare them for it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. swseansw 10:04 PM 1/24/09

    well, i came here to study English. Such scientific question is too difficult for me.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. swseansw in reply to EvolveOrDie 10:08 PM 1/24/09

    i don't think so. even it sees the socalled future, i think it is the brain's reflection to the environment around. i think it's just our thought, not future.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. rumjanek 12:21 PM 1/25/09

    I haven't read the article but surely enough there has to be a comparison with monkeys in the dark which will not perform any tasks to eliminate what Briggsbio is arguing

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Does fMRI See the Future?

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X