60-Second Science

Dogs Gauge Intention by Human Communication Style

Dogs are similar to babies in their ability to discern an intent by a human to communicate meaningful information. Rose Eveleth reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Sit, stay, down, no, don't eat that, drop it. Dogs. We pet them, we love them, we talk to them. But are they listening?

Of course they are. And recent research found that dogs are paying attention not only to what we say, but to how we say it.

The study [Ernő Téglás et al., "Dogs' Gaze Following Is Tuned to Human Communicative Signals," Current Biology], used a method commonly deployed on babies: tracking eye movements. If the baby, or in this case the dog, looks at something, it’s assumed that they're interested in it.

The researchers showed dogs two videos. In one, a person looks into the camera and says "hi dog!" in a high-pitched voice before turning towards a plastic pot. In the other, the person avoids eye contact and says “hi dog” in a lower voice before turning towards the pot.

And the dogs looked at the pot more often after the "hi dog!" than after the “hi dog.” Meaning the animated delivery style cues the dogs of an intension to communicate. Dogs thus perceive such intent similarly to babies. Except babies are slightly less likely to dig up the flowers in that plastic pot.

—Rose Eveleth

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


Dogs pick up not only on the words we say, but also on our intent to communicate with them, according to a report published online in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on Jan. 5.
Credit: Current Biology, Tégl´s et al.


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. abrasileirosilva 08:01 PM 1/5/12

    Finally a podcast of scientificamerican.com is receiving a picture. Great! Thanks for that! (It is excessive to wish that all podcasts have a picture related to the theme that it is treating?).

    However, the voice in the podcast that interprets the *hi dog* *in a high-pitched voice* and *in a lower voice* is an inappropriate and sad voice that I presume is from Steve Mirsky. In the picture a woman is the person that the dog is observing, therefore it is more than natural and expected that the voice in the podcast that say *hi dog* it were from a woman. But, the ego of Mr. Mirsky spoke higher and he decided introduce his own voice to adorn our podcast, is not it?

    Ah, nice and fruitful new year for you Mr. Mirsky (despite of your voice making sound effects and of your abhorred humour which, this at least, fortunately has been put aside recently), for all producers and presenters of the podcasts, inclusive to Ms. Rose Eveleth and also for all commentators of this common space!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Dogs Gauge Intention by Human Communication Style

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X