60-Second Science

End of the World [1999 Edition]

At the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Stony Brook University's Robert Crease talked about how a 1999 article in Scientific American on Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and a future Nobel laureate got a few people thinking the planet was in jeopardy. Steve Mirsky reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Humankind's Enduring Fascination with the Apocalypse The so-called Mayan apocalypse is just the latest in a long line of doomsday predictions  » December 19, 2012

At the recent AAAS meeting, Stony Brook University’s Robert Crease talked about a doomsday scare involving Scientific American and Brookhaven National Lab’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, or RHIC:

“As the accelerator neared completion in 1999, Scientific American ran an article about RHIC, called ‘A Little Big Bang,’ with the title referring to the machine’s ambition to study forms of matter in the early universe.”

A reader wrote in wondering if black holes might be created. Sci Am printed the letter with a considered response from physicist Frank Wilczek. 

“Wilzcek said that the black hole scenario was incredible. But he also said that there’s a more likely possibility that it might create strangelets, which would swallow ordinary matter and described that as [merely] not plausible. That then prompted a series of headlines including this from the Sunday Times of London, entitled ‘Big Bang Machine Could Destroy Earth’.”

Scientific American, Brookhaven and the Earth survived. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize in 2004 for his earlier work.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. candide 09:44 AM 2/25/10

    Maybe Mr. Wilzek should have taken a couple minutes more time and written his response a bit more clearly.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. agenthucky 11:02 AM 2/25/10

    What a busy year, with people freaking out about Y2K, and all. I think 2011 will be better, with people concentrating on just 1 rediculous doomsday scenario.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jtdwyer 06:13 PM 2/25/10

    Just wait until 12/21/2012, when the Mayan calendar ends. Of course, our calendar ends every 12/31...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. brettrodgers421 06:21 PM 12/5/11

    I dont know whats gonna happen when the <a href="http://2012mayancalendar1.blogspot.com">mayan calendar ends</a> because its just freaky stuff!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. alan6302 10:19 AM 3/8/12

    dec 21 2012 .....solar flare ,.......DNA attack

    Ad 3100 Meek will take over....dna attack

    AD 10100 sun blows up

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

End of the World [1999 Edition]

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X