60-Second Earth

Energy Hits the U.S. Presidential Campaign Trail

Romney wants "energy independence," Obama prefers an "all of the above" approach. What's the difference? David Biello reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney pledged to achieve North American energy independence by 2020 this week. That's a presidential move because every president since Richard Nixon has pledged some version of the same thing, including Romney's opponent President Barack Obama.

Obama's version is called the all of the above strategy: more domestic oil production to reduce imports. More electricity derived from wind, sunshine and natural gas added to the U.S. grid. Even more coal, as long as it has CO2 capture and storage attached.

Romney's plan differs only in the details. That increased domestic oil production should come from drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other public lands, for example, as well as off the Eastern seaboard. Both candidates love biofuels, even ethanol from corn.

The candidates share another similarity as well: an inability to discuss climate change on the campaign trail. And global warming is one of the largest environmental consequences of U.S. energy policy or, for the past half century, the lack of a coherent one. Until issues like climate change are included in the discussion, any energy plan is just a lot of hot air.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. grifter1337 07:56 PM 8/26/12

    You cannot really blame them for not taking a stance on climate change. We will just have to see which of their policies will help more. Standing up for either side right now is political suicide. people on both sides of this issue at this point are pretty much just staring at the other side in disbelief that the other side could possibly not agree with them.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. edkerr10 10:31 AM 8/27/12

    David,
    In four short paragraphs you have summed up the issue concisely. Now if we could get the MSM to run articles like this so as to reach a critical number of minds.
    Frustrating......

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. ztoreg 07:16 PM 8/27/12

    Hi, I don't know what happened, but since yesterday all the audio links redirected me to the one with "New Gels Heal Themselves--and Maybe You".
    Somebody got any idea?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. liyige 10:21 AM 8/28/12

    I have met the same situation, and I really want to know what happened.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. sethdiyal 01:18 PM 8/29/12

    With the Obama's core of antinuke activists passively resisting nuclear power always damning it with faint praise and actively blocking research and construction of Gen IV technologies, we have Romney promising to cut the NRC's blocking times from almost infinity to two years. Great but likely mere words.

    Unfortunately, both organizations and all its politicians as well as virtually all American media are effectively owned by Big Oil, which knows nuke power is its only competitor.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Energy Hits the U.S. Presidential Campaign Trail

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X