More 60-Second Science
How many times has it happened to you: you’re sitting around watching a rerun of Friends and you think: Man, if only I could catch a whiff of that hazelnut mocchaccino they’re all pretending to drink. Well, me neither.
But engineers have now developed a programmable, odor-emitting device that, like it or not, brings us one step closer to realizing the dream of smell-a-vision. Their design is described in the journal Angewandte Chemie. [Hyunsu Kim et al, An X–Y Addressable Matrix Odor-Releasing System Using an On–Off Switchable Device]
TV tickles us with sight and sound. Why not smells? All you’d need is a box that would sit near the set and generate fragrances that match the images on screen: a woman’s perfume or a hot apple pie. But how big would the device have to be to generate thousands of odors?
To keep the dimensions down, the scientists envision using a 100-by-100 grid, so that just 200 on/off switches could unleash 10,000 stored bouquets. Which they say makes the whole thing “quite doable.”
The question then becomes: why would anyone want to do it? Presumably there are some things that are best left unsmelled. Because a sound cue is perfectly sufficient to tell us where Archie Bunker or Al Bundy has just been.
—Karen Hopkin
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about


3 Comments
Add CommentCan you imagine - beer and taco-bell taco grande fueled teen-age "coming of age" movie...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisDear SA:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTelesmell would be a better name descriptor. Smell-a-vision sounds moronic once you know the Latin meanings. I think of an eyeball in my nose instead of the transportation of smell across distances. Seriously, it really bugs me to read that...
The article asks: "why would anyone want to do it?"
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA.: To sell more burgers, soft drinks, etc., of course!