60-Second Science

Exoplanet Strikes Carbon Pay Dirt

Analysis of the chemical signature of gas giant exoplanet WASP 12 b reveals it to have a highly unusual makeup of more carbon than oxygen, with implications for the types of rocky planets that may be out there. Christopher Intagliata reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Imagine climbing diamond mountains, or hiking around the graphite shores of a lake of tar. Sound a little sci-fi? Well a new discovery suggests planets like that might be out there—planets littered with carbon minerals, instead of the oxygen-rich silicates, like quartz, that cover the Earth. Because astronomers have found the first carbon-rich exoplanet, with more carbon than oxygen in its atmosphere—instead of the 1 to 2 carbon to oxygen ratio found in our solar system.

The exoplanet, called WASP 12 b, is a gas giant, like Jupiter. By taking the spectrum of heat radiating from the planet, the researchers found that the planet's atmosphere was loaded with carbon, in the form of carbon monoxide and methane. The study appears in the journal Nature. [Nikku Madhusudhan et al., "A high C/O ratio and weak thermal inversion in the atmosphere of exoplanet WASP-12b"]

The finding suggests one commonly accepted model of planetary formation, where icy chunks glom into a core, wouldn't work here. Instead the core may have formed from carbon-rich fragments, like tar. But more than that, this unusual planet is more proof of the diversity of the universe—and it makes those dreams of diamond planets a tiny bit more plausible.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Chicago Jim 11:02 PM 12/12/10

    Gee hysdrocarbons, like tar, formed without the decay of small seacreatures. Makes you wonder if the common theory of how petroleum got under the earth is basically flawed. If oil, and it's relatives, were part of the original forming of our planet, then there is probably a lot more of it than what the naysayers claim...and it is more common throughout the universe than we thought! Now if Shell or Mobil-Exxon would just invest in interplanetary exploration...just imagine it!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. whyterose1471 03:51 PM 12/28/10

    Ironically, it is likely to be the large corporations that eventually send people out into space. Provided of course we don't poison ourselves in our own waste or bomb ourselves back a few millenia over who has the last of the oil/drinking water. Governments (other than possibly the Chinese) are simply too short-termist and lack the necessary political will.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Exoplanet Strikes Carbon Pay Dirt

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X