60-Second Science

Fix Congress's SciTech "Lobotomy"

Rep. Rush Holt, a physicist, says of the 1995 defunding of the Office of Technology Assessment: "Congress gave itself a lobotomy." Policy expert Lewis Branscomb offered reasons to bring back the OTA at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Chicago on Feb. 14th. Steve Mirsky reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Time to bring back the Office of Technology Assessment. The OTA was created in 1972 to provide Congress with an objective analysis of complex scientific and technological issues. But it was killed in ‘95. Rush Holt, one of three physicists in Congress, sent a statement to the AAAS meeting in Chicago last week that said, “When the OTA was disbanded, Congress gave itself a lobotomy.” At the meeting, Lewis Branscomb, from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, offered reasons to restore the OTA:

“First obviously technical understanding is much more critical to public policy now than it was in ’94. Consider energy independence, global climate change, nuclear weapons proliferation, and mutation of viruses into global disease threats—all major issues facing us today. Second, the American economy is more dependent than ever on innovation to give us a competitive advantage. Given the global competition we face, it will require the U.S. to improve more rapidly its own research and innovation capability.”

—Steve Mirsky 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes 


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. ScienceCheerleader 12:22 PM 2/19/09

    Let's hear it for the OTA! Anyone interested in the push to revive the OTA (particularly an OTA that will include a mechanism for public participation) should consider joining the OTA Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=39385247687

    -Darlene

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Robinstar 09:51 PM 2/21/09

    I love such a program and hope to see more on it

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Fix Congress's SciTech "Lobotomy"

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X