60-Second Health

Meta-Study: Moderate Coffee Cuts Cardiac Failure

Sixteen ounces of coffee a day cut the risk of heart failure, but 40 daily ounces of coffee upped the odds of ticker trouble. Katherine Harmon reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

A good cup of coffee can get you out of bed in the morning. But for heart patients coffee's often on the list of things to avoid. The American Heart Association advises that it might increase the risk of heart failure.

But a new report suggests that moderate coffee drinking could actually lower the odds of heart failure. The findings are in the journal Circulation. [Elizabeth Mostofsky et al, Habitual Coffee Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis]

Researchers poured through five studies that followed more than 140,000 European adults, and included information about coffee intake. People who drank about 16 ounces of coffee a day—a grande in Starbucks-speak—had about an 11 percent reduction of the risk of heart failure. People who drink coffee also seem to have less type 2 diabetes, another risk factor for heart disease.

But that doesn't mean it's time to start ordering the venti. In the studies, people who consumed more than 40 ounces a day were at an increased risk for heart failure. More research should filter out the best info, which will percolate down to the public.

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]      
 


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. abrasileirosilva 06:43 PM 6/26/12

    A good link about this research is here:

    http://www.bidmc.org/News/InMedicine/2012/June/Mittleman_Coffee.aspx

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. billsmith 07:39 PM 6/26/12

    Thank you for including the title of the journal article, Ms. Harmon!

    A pre-print version of it is actually available for free:
    http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/content/early/2012/06/26/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967299.full.pdf

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. abrasileirosilva in reply to billsmith 09:36 PM 6/26/12

    @ billsmith.

    Very well, thanks so much!

    And here, located from your indication, billsmith, is the Abstract of that research, available and for free:

    http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/content/early/2012/06/26/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967299.abstract

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. shojaeiiman 06:28 AM 7/3/12

    Do you know to which side medical researchers are moving? Everyday I read articles about recent medical improvements in the magazines or on the internet but.... Take a look at these titles: Smoking can cause cancer, Heavy tea drinkers are more likely to develope cancer, Moderate coffee is useful but heavy coffee is harmful. I think these were obvious for even the first human.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. masoud_ghaffarian 08:01 AM 7/4/12

    the caffeine in the coffee have diffrent effect in body.the caffeine can increased attention and memory performance and also can increased physical performance and muscular recovery.I sppose that coffee have good specialities but it also have very bad virtual in body.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Meta-Study: Moderate Coffee Cuts Cardiac Failure

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X