60-Second Science

Milky Way Now in Larger Size!

A study presented at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society finds that we're moving 100,000 miles per hour faster in our galactic orbit than we thought, and that the Milky Way Galaxy is half again as massive as previously believed. Steve Mirsky reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

We residents of the Milky Way should have a little extra skip in our step today. Turns out our home galaxy is much bigger and moving a lot faster than we previously thought. That’s what researchers from the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics reported January 5th at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

Older studies of our galaxy’s structure and motion used indirect measurements. But we can now use radio telescopes to directly observe certain features of the galaxy when we’re in very different places in our orbit around the sun. And using traditional surveying methods, such as triangulation, researchers came up with the new figures.

First, we’re moving about 600,000 miles per hour in our galactic orbit, a lot zippier than the old estimate of 500,000. And the Milky Way’s total mass is about half again as much as we used to think. Which means we’re about as massive as the nearby Andromeda Galaxy. The Milky Way’s bigger mass does mean a greater chance of a gravity-driven collision with Andromeda. But if that clash occurs, at least now we’re in the same weight-class.

—Steve Mirsky 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes 


10 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. frankstein 01:54 PM 1/5/09

    YOU could not help yourself? Same Weight class? What is that, zero for zero gravity? And should I schedule my arrival in Andromeda soon?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. frankstein 01:56 PM 1/5/09

    Same Weight class? You could not help yourself right? Weight is zero right? By the way, that intersection with Andromeda, should I cancel lunch?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. frankstein in reply to frankstein 01:57 PM 1/5/09

    who is this guy frank stein and why does he comment twice, oops three times

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Tony Johansen 01:25 AM 1/6/09

    As the relative motions of Andromeda and the Milky Way have yet to be determined with any real certainty it is far too premature to be assuming a collision between the galaxies.

    Most people seem to be using the older projections that we are moving directly toward each other but as this current study suggests, measuring motion in 3 dimensions is notoriously difficult to achieve and that the results from a 3 dimensional study can dramatically change everything - a 50% bigger galaxy is no small change!

    Problem is that the further away something is the more difficult it is to determine 3 dimensional reality. Thus the current estimates of the speed the two galaxies approach each other can only reveal the component of the movement that is toward us. It cannot show the motion on any other axis and until that is determined accurately we cannot determine the actual direction Andromeda is traveling in and thus the likelihood of a collision, near miss or other scenario. There was some suggestion earlier in the year that the actual courses of the two galaxies would not collide but much more work needs to be done to confirm that, if true.

    Meanwhile, if our Milky Way could speak, it might protest that predictions of its imminent demise are greatly exaggerated.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. valhall 12:41 PM 1/6/09


    To determine the axis of our galaxy
    the half-mtass was
    not known? Nevertheless I found another method with glaciers to specify
    the rotation-axis of our galaxy.
    Reference:
    "the Milky Ways total mass is about half again as much"

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. valhall 12:47 PM 1/6/09

    To determine the axis of our galaxy
    their half-mass
    was not specified a few years ago and actually not known.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. jimk00 10:49 PM 1/7/09

    This article is much better written than the AP article which contains the phrase "...denser, with 50 percent more mass, which is like weight." Can you believe it? See http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCI_MILKY_WAY?SITE=ORLAG&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
    By the way, I liked the joke about "weight class".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Quinn the Eskimo 04:32 PM 1/8/09

    So... No Social Security checks after all?

    Has anyone told Obama yet?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. popeyeus 02:22 AM 2/1/09

    So does moving at 600,000 miles an hour in space enough speed to prevent us from being sucked into the massive black hole at the center of our galaxy?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Lancelot039 12:35 PM 3/14/09

    At 600,000 miles per hour, it would take the sun about 28,500 years or so to cross the 25.3 light years distance to Vega (provided it did not move during that time), which is roughly where the sun is aiming. So far the Sun has been travelling 4.6 billion years, completing about 23 nearly circular orbits around the galactic center (26,000 light-years away) without hitting anything big, or being sucked-in.

    If you are really looking for things to worry about, at a distance of 2 million light-years, maybe Andromeda is not our biggest concern, apparently, the Milky Way has been actively merging for some time with a dwarf galaxy found in the direction of Virgo, 30,000 light-years away and which is throwing 100,000 stars at us.

    Maybe the more pressing danger is our own insanity. Knowing what we can do, perhaps it would be wiser to cancel your lunch after all.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Milky Way Now in Larger Size!

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X