More 60-Second Science
Rivers today have high muddy banks, sandbars and bends. But they didn’t always look that way. Because it wasn’t until the evolution of treelike plants, some 330 million years ago, that rivers were corralled into their current form. Before that, ancient waters flowed wide and shallow over the land, with little to constrain them other than mountains. So says a study in the journal Nature Geoscience. [Neil S. Davies and Martin R. Gibling, "Evolution of fixed-channel alluvial plains in response to Carboniferous vegetation"]
Researchers looked through over 400 studies of the Earth’s rock record, and visited nearly 70 field sites. And they found that channel formations in the rock—a signature of modern rivers—didn’t appear until the Carboniferous period, when tree-like plants evolved. That’s because larger plants needed deeper roots, which stabilized river banks and forced rivers into narrower paths. And deep roots helped form sticky clays, which are harder to erode.
All this engineering was to the trees’ advantage, the researchers say. Because river banks provide trees with easy access to water, without the constant risk of flooding. Pretty much what we humans want. Many of our greatest cities formed along river banks—for which we might have trees to thank.
—Christopher Intagliata
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
[Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group.]



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about





3 Comments
Add CommentThe title of the Nature article is "Evolution of fixed-channel alluvial plains in response to Carboniferous vegetation". The SA title "Modern Rivers Shaped By Trees" seems to imply a very general contribution of treelike plants to formation and development of current rivers, but it difficult for me to imagine that trees much affected the formation of the Channeled Scablands of Eastern Washington or the Mississippi River's deep channels likely formed by glacial runoff or the Colorado river. I suspect SA takes some liberties with the conclusions of the (unread $35) research report...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe only subject more boring than geology is probably sedimentary geology. Trees causing a bit of water to push around a bit of dirt in a slightly different way--how profound! I'm sure this is very exciting news to the dozen or so academics who study the effects of vegetation on river evolution...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTrees? It depends where. Thousands of kilometers of rivers wind throughout the prairies of Canada in largely treeless environmnets. More tens of thousands of kilometers of river flow through the treeless Arctic.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this