60-Second Mind

Natural Setting and Tech Break Boost Creativity

Volunteers who spent at least four days hiking with no communications or computing technology scored higher on creativity tests upon their return than did a control group. Rose Eveleth reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Robert Frost famously wrote: "The woods are lovely, dark and deep."

But such natural settings may offer more than just beauty. They might also foster creativity. A recent study suggests that a backpacking trip can substantially increase just how inventive your brain can be. The finding is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Ruth Ann Atchley, David L. Strayer and Paul Atchley, Creativity in the Wild: Improving Creative Reasoning through Immersion in Natural Settings]

Researchers sent 56 subjects out on four-to-six day wilderness hiking trips without access to electronic devices—no cell phones, no iPads, no game boys, nothing.

Upon their return, the hikers took tests designed to measure creativity. A control group that hadn't been in the woods scored a 4.14 out of 10 on the test. But the woods wanderers scored a 6.08.

Previous studies have shown that down time in general makes people more creative. The researchers thus say that this creativity boost is probably due to not just nature, but to taking a break from the stresses of work and technology.

So the next time you get stuck on a tough problem, or can't seem to concentrate—try a walk in the woods. It could help your creative promise.

—Rose Eveleth

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 


10 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Pescador99 11:52 AM 12/22/12

    I agree too, but I can't imagine how this could possibly be a double blind experiment. It would be nice to have some reference to the actual study itself...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. hanmeng 01:46 PM 12/22/12

    So, a ten minute walk in the woods (no doubt listening to music on headphones in case you can't find anyone to talk to on your cell phone) is comparable to a four-to-six day wilderness hiking trip without access to electronic devices?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Pescador99 in reply to hanmeng 01:53 PM 12/22/12

    You wish...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Pescador99 in reply to Pescador99 04:59 PM 12/22/12

    OK, sorry, I should have looked more closely. The link to the original article is there. My bad.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. abrasileirosilva 05:28 PM 12/22/12

    In the final of the *Abstract* we can read this:

    *A limitation of the current research is the inability to determine if the effects are due to an increased exposure to nature, a decreased exposure to technology, or to other factors associated with spending three days immersed in nature.*

    With base in that paragraph we can easily conclude that this research is simply irrelevant.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Pescador99 12:39 PM 12/23/12

    I wouldn't go so far as to say Irrelevant. At the very least it gives the pointer towards additional research. Each of those iterations, 1. Increased exposure to nature 2. decreased exposure to technology 3. Ceasing to work for a specified period of time would need to be tested separately. But I agree, not much hard data came from this one study.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Laroquod 08:52 PM 1/2/13

    Did they really test the creativity boost of a break from technology? Or did they actually just test the creativity boost of a nearly week-long vacation?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. majid.taie 08:10 PM 3/24/13

    I do agree with the results of the research. My own experience shows being in natural place like mountainous areas can improve my mood and as a result my creativity encourages as well.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Pescador99 in reply to majid.taie 12:59 PM 3/25/13

    I very much agree with the premise.
    I would be quite shocked if it were proved wrong.
    My quibble was with the method.
    It seemed somewhat less than... well.. scientific...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Adam Flanders 04:36 PM 4/18/13

    Did the study make any effort to compensate for confounding factors like exercise? Hiking several days in the woods would mean significant exercise and changes in brain chemistry due to the release of endorphins, among other things.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Natural Setting and Tech Break Boost Creativity

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X