60-Second Space

New Analyses Resurrect Contested Exoplanet Claim

Fomalhaut b looked like an exoplanet to some astronomers and like dust to others. But new analyses strengthen the planet view. John Matson reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Seeing is believing. And then disbelieving. And maybe believing once more.

The exoplanet Fomalhaut b was the first one photographed with visible light. Researchers using the Hubble Space Telescope spotted it in 2008, orbiting a star 25 light-years away. The sighting made big news, because almost all exoplanet discoveries before or since were indirect detections. But with Fomalhaut b, astronomers could actually see the planet.

Well, some astronomers. Researchers using the Spitzer Space Telescope could not see Fomalhaut b at all in infrared light. They concluded that what Hubble had seen was probably just a transient dust cloud.

Now two new studies posted at arxiv.org have strengthened the planetary argument. Two teams reanalyzed the data and confirmed that there is something there. But what? One group concluded that the object could be the debris from a smashup of two small objects, or it could be a planet surrounded by a disk of dust. [Raphaël Galicher et al, Fomalhaut b: Independent Analysis of the Hubble Space Telescope Public Archive Data] The other group favors the hypothesis that Fomalhaut b is an exoplanet, albeit one shrouded in dust. [Thayne Currie et al, Direct Imaging Confirmation and Characterization of a Dust-Enshrouded Candidate Exoplanet Orbiting Fomalhaut]

Paul Kalas, one of the planet’s original discoverers, says he will have new data to show in January. Until then, it’s either Fomalhaut or Fomal-naught.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Acoyauh2 01:07 PM 11/7/12

    "Fomelhaut b looked like an exoplanet to some astronomers and like dust to others. But new analyses strenthen the planet view."
    Fomalhaut. Strengthen. Now we're writing the articles in 60 seconds, too? Sorry, it was stronger than me =P

    Now that elections are over, can we vote on this? I vote planet!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

New Analyses Resurrect Contested Exoplanet Claim

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X