60-Second Mind

Paying in Cash Keeps Us Healthy

Recent research finds that our vices can be held back when we use cash instead of credit cards at the grocery store. Christie Nicholson reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

We humans can so easily give in to our vices. Something as simple as a credit card can weaken self-control. The good news is that the reverse is also true: cash can buffer us from indulgence. So says a study in the Journal of Consumer Research.



Scientists analyzed people’s perceptions of various food types and found that foods considered unhealthy were also seen as more likely to be impulse buys. The researchers then followed the grocery shopping habits of 1,000 households over six months. They found that people bought a larger proportion of unhealthy and impulsive food choices (think: jelly doughnuts) when they used their credit or debit card versus cash.


Desire that leads to impulsive behavior is caused by so-called "visceral factors," like the anticipation of the pleasure of eating the doughnut. And so the author's note that desire might be weakened by aversive visceral factors, like pain. Other studies have found that paying with cash was more painful that tossing over the credit card. 



So the pain of cash payment seemed to actually control buyers’ impulses. Seems like the craving to eat a Napoleon can be topped by the desire to hold on to your Benjamins.

—Christie Nicholson


6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Bill Williams 05:26 PM 6/26/11

    Ths is great great advice. It's too bad that Corporate America wants to eliminate cash as a payment option. Strangely, some brick-and-mortar businesses no longer accept cash!

    Corporations exist to extract your money from our wallets. They know this article is accurate, i.e., we spend more on credit, which is why they it so easy to access and use. There is huge money to be made in credit card transactions and the resulting credit balances. Given those motivations, printed money may well disappear in the future.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer 03:31 AM 6/27/11

    I find it very curious that these studies reportedly produce identical results for credit and debit card use, since their is no fiduciary distinction between using a debit card and withdrawing cash to use for purchases.

    I think the identical results using a plastic card of apparently any type rather than counting out cash for purchases is most indicative of the cause of this effect.

    Perhaps the phrase "it's only money" should be replaced with "it's only plastic."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. vagnry 04:02 PM 6/27/11

    Some 20 years ago, a friend, professor of economics, told me the easiest way to keep your budget was to withdraw the cash you could afford to spend the coming month, put it in envelopes, Food, fun, gazoline, etc., and when you see there is not much money left, you naturally get quite stingy.

    Exactly what our grandparents did, it works like a charm, even today!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Martin Wirth 06:39 PM 6/27/11

    The solution would be the Tamagotchi credit/debit card. Some of us remember that little electronic Tamagotchi pet that needed feeding and care. If you neglect it then the thing would cry and eventually die.

    Do something like that with credit and debit cards. Make it frown and or even cry when you spend money. Going broke? It cries loudly, moans, and sheds graphic little tears. Have pity on it. Put money in your account. Then it will smile again.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. sunnystrobe 05:55 AM 6/30/11

    Could it be that, deep down in our still so playfully neotenous primates' brain, our credit cards should range under virtual 'card games'?
    Smelly bank notes, on the other hand, are more personal, 'in-hand', and have to be collected more like 'fruits' of our labour, whether from employers, or bank teller machines; they are literally quite a 'handful' to hold and to have, until we opt to part with them for a 'give & take', i.e. bartering, transaction.
    Any nicely domesticated chimp like Kanzi would understand: you want 'tit for tat', no less, nor more!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. camglna 12:14 AM 1/8/12

    there's no such word "aversive" in my ten dictionaries.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Paying in Cash Keeps Us Healthy

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X