60-Second Mind

Poor Linguistic Ability May Indicate Risk of Alzheimer's

A series of longitudinal studies done with nuns out of the University of Kentucky shows a significant relationship between linguistic ability early in life and the development of Alzheimer's later in life. Christie Nicholson reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

Back in the late 90s a team at the University of Kentucky performed a series of long-term studies on nuns. And these studies have uncovered some surprising clues for possible Alzheimer’s risk.

One of these studies, published in the Annals New York Academy of Sciences, found that poor linguistic ability early in life is associated with a risk of developing dementia later on.  

Researchers got their hands on archival autobiographical sketches written by 74 nuns, from Baltimore and Milwaukee, completed between ages 19 and 37 years. All died an average of 62 years after writing their sketches, and the nuns had agreed to donate their brains for study.

Here is what scientists found:   The number of ideas expressed in those autobiographies had a inverse association with the severity of dementia later in life. For instance in the sentence, “I was born in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, on May 24, 1913, and was baptized in a church,” has seven ideas according to the researchers. Phrases like “I was born” and “I was baptized in church” all count toward what they call a measurement of “idea density.”

They found a strong association between those whose autobiographies had low idea density and presence of the Alzheimer-related tangles in the frontal, temporal or parietal lobe of the brain.  

Studies like this point to the possibility of detecting Alzheimer risk much earlier in life and may provide clues to the progression of the illness long before the more serious cognitive damage takes hold.

—Christie Nicholson


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. bobbydelray 07:53 PM 8/22/10

    The Alzheimers Reading Room has clear, concise, usable news, research, insight and advice for the entire Alzheimers community.

    This includes those suffering from Alzheimers disease, Dementia, Alzheimers caregivers and Alzheimers caregiving.

    http://www.alzheimersreadingroom.com/2010/02/about-alzheimers-reading-room.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. blaisem 08:30 PM 8/23/10

    The article doesn't state whether the nuns all had the same educational background. I would assume that is the case; however, I've learned that in science you can't assume anything about the conditions of a study.

    If the nuns who were more prolific in expressing ideas also came from households that were more verbal and expressive, that might provide a slightly different perspective on the potential causes of Alzheimer's.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. emil47 11:54 AM 8/24/10

    I doubt that Terry Pratchett has poor verbal abilities.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. AuroraDawn in reply to emil47 12:29 PM 8/24/10

    That is quite true, he is one of my favorite writers. They are only stating a strong association not a definite cause and affect relationship. If the latter were true we would have, based on my experience working in schools, an overwhelming surge in the number of Alzheimer's sufferers in about 50 years.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Poor Linguistic Ability May Indicate Risk of Alzheimer's

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X