More 60-Second Science
Not taking the elevator is a good way to sneak in a little extra exercise every day. And if you do get some of your exercise avoiding elevators, here’s a burning question: do you burn more calories climbing stairs one at a time or bounding up them two at a time?
To find out, researchers had subjects climb stairs reaching 46 feet high. Based on the subjects’ heart rate measurements, the researchers estimated calories burned. They found that volunteers who took the stairs two at a time had a higher rate of energy expenditure over the 86 steps they climbed—but those who climbed one at a time burned more energy in total over the entire staircase. The study is in the journal PLoS One. [Lewis G. Halsey, David A.R. Watkins and Brendan M. Duggan, The Energy Expenditure of Stair Climbing One Step and Two Steps at a Time: Estimations from Measures of Heart Rate]
It makes sense. Although the bounders had a more intense workout, the one-steppers take longer to get to the top. So even though they’re burning fewer calories per minute than the bounders do, they work out enough longer to burn more total calories. And one step or two, there’s never a wait for the stairs.
—Rose Eveleth
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about




2 Comments
Add CommentDoes not make sense to me, I would have thought it takes 4 times the energy to go twice the speed.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMy understanding of the physiology involved was that the bounders who climbed faster would incur an oxygen debt and would have elevated pulse and breathing rates for some time after the climb. I think the recovery time needs to be included here.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this