Science Talk

State of the Union: Research, Technology and Energy

About six minutes of President Obama's State of the Union address dealt with research, technology and energy














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Podcast Transcription

Steve:          Welcome to the Scientific American podcast, Science Talk, posted on January 25th, 2012, I'm Steve Mirsky. Last night President Obama delivered the State of the Union address. Here's a little more than six minutes of the sections dealing with research, technology and energy. Anywhere I have made an edit in the audio, you'll hear a musical interlude. And I have lowered the volume on some of the applause for the sake of all of our ears. I think science-interested listeners across the political spectrum can find points of both strong agreement and major disagreement in these few minutes of the talk.

Obama:          Hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge. The fact that they aren't yet American citizens. Many who are brought here are as small children are American through and through. Yet they live everyday with the threat of the deportation. Others came more recently to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home, to invent new products, and create new jobs somewhere else. That doesn't make sense…. Let's at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, defend this country…. Innovation also demands basic research. Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched. New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet. Don't gut these investments in our budget. Don't let other countries win the race for the future. Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet, to new American jobs and new American industries. And nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American made energy. Over the last three years we've opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight I am directing my administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. (applause) Right now, right now, American oil production is the highest that has been in eight years—that's right, eight years. Not only that, last year we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past 16 years (applause). But with only 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, oil isn't enough. This country needs an all out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy (applause); a strategy that's cleaner, cheaper and full of new jobs. We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly 100 years (applause), and my administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. The experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade, and I am requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. (applause)because America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk. The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don't have to choose between our environment and our economy. And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of 30 years that helped develop the technologies to extract all of this natural gas out of shale rock reminding us that government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground. (applause) Now what is true for natural gas is just as true for clean energy. In three years our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world's leading manufacturer of high tech batteries. Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled and thousands of Americans have jobs because of it…. I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refused to make the same commitment here. We've subsidized oil companies for a century. That's long enough. It's time to end the taxpayer giveaways (applause) to an industry that rarely has been more profitable and double down on a clean energy industry that never has been more promising. Pass clean energy tax credits; create these jobs. We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives. The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change. But there is no reason why Congress shouldn't at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. So far, you haven't acted. Well, tonight I will. I am directing my administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power 3 million homes, and I am proud to announce that the Department of Defense working with us, the world's largest consumer of energy will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history, with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year. (applause)

Steve:          For more on energy in the State of the Union, see Fred Guterl's article at http://ScientificAmerican.com titled "How Obama Plans to 'Double Down' on Clean Energy." For Scientific American's Science Talk, I'm Steve Mirsky. Thanks for clicking on us.


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. StuntJournalist 01:40 PM 1/25/12

    Partnership with private sector = now that the American taxpayer has paid for the RD&D, now I will hand to profits of algae and 2nd gen biofuel over to my cronies

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Benjaminlately in reply to StuntJournalist 04:00 PM 1/25/12

    It isn't exactly a bad thing... It would be worse if the government was responsible for taking developed products to market.

    R&D is expensive, and the private sector is more likely to invest in things they think are going to work. The government is in a better position to take on risky R&D.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Mr Mistoffelees 11:43 PM 1/26/12

    Government R&D partnerships with industry are not about the government doing the R&D and then passing on their knowledge to industry. It is about the government funding industry (often through tax credits) to do research. The idea is that the money allows corporations to take on higher-risk projects. Such projects often fail to produce what was intended but they nevertheless are valuable because of the knowledge that those involved acquired throughout the project.

    Of course, the corporation might have done the R&D project anyway, or on a smaller scale, so it is hard to say exactly how much the largess of government spurs innovation in that regard.

    Corporations created to develop R&D done in government (academic) labs are different because the basic research is already done and the task is to turn that into a marketable product backed up with a business plan. Often the university or lab involved owns the intellectual property and so it gets royalties from the revenue stream generated by the corporation, if and when, the product goes to market.

    Sometimes established corporations approach universities that have developed prototypes of products in their lab. They come to some sort of financial arrangement for its use and the corporation then turns the prototype into a product and sells it, or incorporates it into an established product as an enhancement.

    These latter two are examples of where government funding has directly produced or aided industry in innovation.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Mr Mistoffelees 12:19 AM 1/27/12

    One more point. The prototypes developed in academic labs are notoriously flakey because they are usually the result of multiple graduate students working on little pieces for the thesis. The thing sort of works, but to productize it means that it has to be fully re-engineered as a whole, and that can be a non-trivial task.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

State of the Union: Research, Technology and Energy

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X