60-Second Science

Student Researchers Find Secret Tea Ingredients

Three NYC high school students did DNA analyses of various teas and spotted sequences belonging to lots of flora that weren't listed on the label. Cynthia Graber reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

After water, tea is the world’s most popular drink. Now three New York City high school students [Catherine Gamble, Rohan Kirpekar and Grace Young] have discovered what may be a brewing scandal. Because they found stuff in lots of teas that shouldn’t be there.

The students were guided by professional researchers as they worked their way through 70 teas and 60 herbal varieties. The material tested came from 33 companies and originated in 17 countries.

The high schoolers extracted and amplified the tea DNA and then sent it to a sequencing facility. They then compared the sequences they got back with known sequences listed in the GenBank database maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

The junior scientists found that four percent of the straight teas contained additional plant material. And more than a third of the herbal products included unlisted ingredients – such as the weeds bluegrass and white goosefoot. Four of the herbal mixes contained relatives of parsley. And seven had unlisted chamomile.

The research was published in the Nature journal Scientific Reports. [Mark Stoeckle et al., "Commercial Teas Highlight Plant DNA Barcode Identification Successes and Obstacles"]

The effort shows that it’s possible to cheaply identify food ingredients and do quality control. And all that chamomile may represent an attempt to keep us calm about impurities.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group.]


9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. hobsonlane 10:50 PM 7/21/11

    Impressive work. Thanks to SA for giving the students some well-deserved attention. Hopefully the article will inspire a few more kitchen DNA sequencing kids to fill the gaping hole in food quality information from the FDA.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JamesDavis 07:23 AM 7/22/11

    That is impressive work for high school students. They achieved something our own FDA cannot achieve...quality control. Maybe we should replace the FDA with these "very intelligent" high school students and start pointing fingers and naming names of these companies and countries who are polluting our foods and beverages with questionable plant materials and chemicals.

    You should've told us the name of this New York high school so we can donate to their advanced science class...unless they are afraid these companies would try to buy the school off or harm them in someway to keep them quiet.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. GeekStatus 09:11 AM 7/22/11

    It seems to me like those could be common weeds in tea fields. They may not have been intentional additions. The chamomile, perhaps, could be from processing several types of tea on the same equipment. I wouldn't get too up tight over this just yet.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. TobyNSaunders 10:10 PM 7/22/11

    It's worth tea & coffee users knowing that the plants have different effects. Tea is more introspective & surreal, while coffee is more speedy; the plant chemicals affect the caffeine molecules differently & alter the way the body processes it... but, in larger doses, after caffeine tolerance has sufficiently built up, caffeine has a depressant effect.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. TobyNSaunders in reply to GeekStatus 10:11 PM 7/22/11

    Getting too uptight is bad in accordance with the word 'too'. Anyway, yes, it could be accidental adulterant, & then again some companies are surely adding filler (the stuff is sold by weight after all).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. lorainedg 07:26 PM 7/23/11

    As someone allergic to chamomile who drinks a lot of tea, I'd really like to know which brands had chamomile in them. I seriously disagree with the idea that "all that chamomile may represent [is] an attempt to keep us calm about impurities!"

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Didonai 09:30 PM 7/24/11

    I really don't care.

    I refuse to believe my Earl Grey is not as pure as the
    driven snow.

    It TASTES fine!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. suzwriter 03:01 AM 7/28/11

    I would have loved to have done this kind of research at school! Great work from the students at Trinity School in New York City. We've linked to this at www.genome-engineering.com/checking-up-on-tea.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. emilyhasbooks in reply to GeekStatus 04:37 PM 8/4/11

    Exactly.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Student Researchers Find Secret Tea Ingredients

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X