60-Second Health

Surgical "Never" Events Happen Nevertheless

The errors known as surgical "never events," which are never supposed to happen, still occur some 4,000 times annually in the U.S. Katherine Harmon reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Surgeons call them "never events,” because they are supposed to never happen: things like leaving a piece of equipment in someone or removing the wrong body part. But despite major efforts to reduce medical errors, these “never events” still occur more than 4,000 times each year in the U.S. That finding is in the journal Surgery. [Winta Mehtsun et al., Surgical Never Events In the United States]

Researchers sifted through thousands of malpractice claims. They found surgeons leave a foreign object inside at least 39 patients each week. And wrong procedures or incorrect site surgeries each occur 20 or more times per week.

Such incidents are obviously preventable. Checklists and equipment counts are supposed to take place in the operating room. Even if you're comatose when going under the knife, you can have a conversation with your doctor beforehand to make sure everyone knows what operation is scheduled. And feel free to ask for a permanent marker drawing on your body. So that the surgeon is greeted with an inked note that says something clear, such as, “Take Out T his Kidney.”

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]


6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jctyler 10:50 AM 1/8/13

    Guess that's why it's a surgeon who invented Murphy's law.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Postman1 02:16 PM 1/11/13

    How many people die annually because of this? Do we need an executive order to outlaw surgical instruments because they kill people? You know, if they are killing people.....?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jctyler 10:39 PM 1/11/13

    ah, the postman...

    well, how many thousands of people are SAVED by surgeons with surgical instruments?

    and since we know from which corner you're trying to shoot, how many people are SAVED by gunners with gunning instruments?

    And then we put the numbers in relation to each other:
    death/saved by surgeons
    death/saved by weapons

    and it looks even worse.

    Hm, I forgot, you want to plant armed guards in front of every school? And before you trip over a funny reply, do you know how the batman killer got his guns into the cinema? Would be a piece of cake to do the same at any school!

    BTW why haven't you commented on the latest climate developments? Starting to feel too obviously wrong? Naw, don't bother.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Postman1 in reply to jctyler 08:51 PM 1/12/13

    Quite a rant, jct, and totally off topic. I'd bite, but you're really kind of all over the place, so I'll wait till a proper article. Take your meds now and calm down.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. jctyler in reply to Postman1 09:12 PM 1/12/13

    Your comment here is without any doubt whatsoever referring to gun control to which you are opposed, concurring with your opinions on the last election and climate change, all of which you posted on SciAm.

    Or are you denying that your comment here refers to gun control?

    As usual when you read the reply you realized how daft your comment was and how easy to deflate and now you want us to believe that you only meant surgery?

    I am right on target if you get the pun. And you know it.



    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. jctyler in reply to Postman1 09:19 PM 1/12/13

    Here, I'll give you a reason to whine:

    'Quite a rant'

    it's not, it's showing how ridiculous your comment is

    'totally off topic'

    absolutely not and everybody knows it

    'I'd bite'

    you're slow, plenty of time for me to get a rabies shot

    'but you're really kind of all over the place'

    haven't been posting here in a long while, especially not since I've been accused of writing a mysoginistic and hateful comment when I had commented in support of North-African women who are kept from schools and jobs by their macho husbands. Which was rather a case of pure social comparison bias cloaked in a zivilitic comment of the dumbest sort.

    'so I'll wait till a proper article'

    I'd like know what you call a proper article. One that mirrors your opinions on the last election, climate change and gun-control? Looking forward to seeing what you consider a proper article.

    'Take your meds now and calm down'

    oh boy, another pathetic attempt at right-wing humour 'sigh - yawn'

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Surgical "Never" Events Happen Nevertheless

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X