More Science Talk
-
Gravity's Engines
We’ve long understood black holes to be the points at which the universe as we know it comes to an end. Often billions of times more massive than the Sun, they...
Read More »
The 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded jointly to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland for experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems.
Wineland co-authored an August, 2008, Scientific American article explaining his work, titled Quantum Computing with Ions.
Philip Yam wrote a review article that includes coverage of this material in the June, 1997, Scientific American, titled Bringing Schrödinger's Cat to Life, available here text-only and in full in our digital archive.
The official Nobel Prize press release reads:
The 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded jointly to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland "for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems".
Particle control in a quantum world
Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland have independently invented and developed methods for measuring and manipulating individual particles while preserving their quantum-mechanical nature, in ways that were previously thought unattainable.
The Nobel Laureates have opened the door to a new era of experimentation with quantum physics by demonstrating the direct observation of individual quantum particles without destroying them. For single particles of light or matter the laws of classical physics cease to apply and quantum physics takes over. But single particles are not easily isolated from their surrounding environment and they lose their mysterious quantum properties as soon as they interact with the outside world. Thus many seemingly bizarre phenomena predicted by quantum physics could not be directly observed, and researchers could only carry out thought experiments that might in principle manifest these bizarre phenomena.
Through their ingenious laboratory methods Haroche and Wineland together with their research groups have managed to measure and control very fragile quantum states, which were previously thought inaccessible for direct observation. The new methods allow them to examine, control and count the particles.
Their methods have many things in common. David Wineland traps electrically charged atoms, or ions, controlling and measuring them with light, or photons.
Serge Haroche takes the opposite approach: he controls and measures trapped photons, or particles of light, by sending atoms through a trap.
Both Laureates work in the field of quantum optics studying the fundamental interaction between light and matter, a field which has seen considerable progress since the mid-1980s. Their ground-breaking methods have enabled this field of research to take the very first steps towards building a new type of super fast computer based on quantum physics. Perhaps the quantum computer will change our everyday lives in this century in the same radical way as the classical computer did in the last century. The research has also led to the construction of extremely precise clocks that could become the future basis for a new standard of time, with more than hundred-fold greater precision than present-day caesium clocks.
The transcript of the podcast reads:
“This year’s Nobel Prize in physics is about the interaction between light and matter.”
Physics Nobel committee member Lars Bergstrom made the announcement just after 5:45am Eastern time.
“The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2012 Nobel Prize in physics to Serge Haroche, at Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France, and David J. Wineland, at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado Boulder, USA. And the Academy citation runs, ’for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems’”.
The work has enabled the entire field to experimentally examine quantum states, the weird behavior of matter on subatomic scales, that were formerly only open to analysis theoretically. The most obvious applications of the measurement and manipulation of quantum systems are atomic clocks of unprecedented accuracy and the eventual advent of quantum computers.
Just after the announcement, Physics Nobel committee member Per Delsing explained to a reporter that this work enables researchers “to take one of the very first steps to show that you can do quantum operations on a quantum system, that’s the first step toward a quantum computer.”
Reporter: “What would a quantum computer do that computers cannot?”
Delsing: “So there are certain algorithms that a quantum computer can do much much faster than an ordinary computer, and the prime example is to factor large numbers into primes, that would be extremely much faster with a quantum computer. The future will tell, I’m sure there will be also a number of other things that will be useful on a quantum computer.”
Reporter: “So why don’t we have it here now?”
Delsing: “Because this is very hard to do. Today we have awarded a Nobel to these two guys who have taken the first steps to have control on a single system, but to make a quantum computer you would have to have the same amount of control on very many particles at the same time.”
Reporter: “So it will not come next year as a Nobel Prize.”
Delsing: “I can almost promise that.”



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about





7 Comments
Add CommentThis ground breaking experimental method discovered by the two Nobel Laureates may facilitate better understanding of the instantaneous interaction due to quantum entanglement and will lead to comprehending verse no. 50 of chapter 16 of the Holy Quran where in God has revealed to us that He is nearer to us than our jugular vein .Similarly many other verses such as the instantaneous transportation (teleportation) of the throne of Queen Sheba revealed to us in verse no. 40 of chapter 27. And etc. All this is will show that the universe is a created subject and there is a Creator God.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAbdul Ghafoor Khan
No offense meant, but here are a few basic logical fallacies we're looking to avoid that are notably present in that comment(i.e. that post has most of them, and I expect that others to follow):
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisArgument from ignorance
Argument from repetition
Argument from silence
Begging the question
(shifting the) Burden of proof
Circular reasoning
Circular cause and consequence
Correlation proves causation
Ecological fallacy
Fallacy of division
False dilemma
If-by-whiskey
Fallacy of many questions
Ludic fallacy
Fallacy of the single cause
Moving the goalposts
Nirvana fallacy
Onus probandi
Not taking a crack at belief (got my own, not devoid of illogical basis) or culture here (logic speaks best in algebraic after all), but backing into all that mid-eastern medieval poetry (beautiful or not) through the western lab-hard quantam backdoor is (to me, and demonstrably so) a sure path to fallacious thinking/exposition that does not lend itself to a serious, useful conversation about the topic at hand.
The results of those kinds of disconnects are writ large in the headlines of the day, might be we can avoid them.
RIP science..
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://img859.imageshack.us/img859/2135/houes.jpg
Too many accusations from ignorance incomment.2.Those who
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisknow about the istantanneous communication(independent of time and distance)between two objects due to quantum entanglement of pairs and the related verses in the H
Holy Quran will understand my comments.The details are available in my book : THE DESIGN OF THE UNIVERSE DEFEATS ATHEISM(in its absolute totality).The more we know
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisabout the classical and non clasical physics,the more we understand the words of the Creator revealed in the Holy Quran.My comments about the experimental method discovered by the two Nobel Laureates is based on my study and not ignorance.
Abdul Ghafoor Khan
Wow, it's awesome to have such an useful book at hand! Now where's the verse in the Holy Quran that tells us how to construct a quantum computer?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisDid David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://newsblaze.com/story/20130112074228nnnn.nb/topstory.html