60-Second Mind

We Think the Future Is Closer Than the Past

A recent study finds that we might think of time as though we are literally moving through it. Christie Nicholson reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

When people talk about the past, they tend to lean slightly back. And if folks talk about things to come they tend to lean forward. Various studies have revealed those physical attitudes. Now a study finds that people usually experience time as if we are literally moving toward the future and away from the past.

Through surveys researchers first determined that subjects perceive future events as being closer than past events, even if the events are equidistant. Then the scientists had subjects experience a virtual reality where they were either walking towards a fountain or backwards away from it. And as they walked, the subjects had to estimate the distance of a specific date. The date they were given was either three weeks ago or three weeks in the future. The participants backing away from the fountain perceived the dates as being equidistant from the present. But those walking towards the fountain estimated the future date to be closer than the past date.

The researchers interpret the finding to mean that the future feels closer because it seems like we’re literally moving towards it. Gives new meaning to the phrase, “Looking forward to seeing you.”

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 


6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. helenavargas 10:22 AM 3/22/13

    Why is this a surprise?
    The past contains many more data than the future does. We entrain much of what occurred in the past -- waking up, eating endless varieties of breakfast, having conversations on countless subjects, most of them unanticipated -- but we have finite expectations of the future. A past that contains even a fraction of what actually occurred is much larger than our prospective version of the future. A chock-full past year, then, seems to cover far more 'time' than a relatively complication-free future year will. So the future seems to move at a faster pace.
    Am I missing something? I would love to be shown wrong.
    Does this disparity also apply to those with problematic memories? I would predict not, if my hypothesis is correct.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. lump1 10:48 AM 3/22/13

    Let me guess: White westerners composed the entire test group, didn't they? The way we spatially represent time is a central research topic of Stanford linguist Lera Boroditsky. Let's just say that it's not the same across cultures. If you've ever seen her speak, you wouldn't be so quick to generalize from a skewed sample.

    http://fora.tv/2010/10/26/Lera_Boroditsky_How_Language_Shapes_Thought

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jtdwyer in reply to lump1 02:59 PM 3/22/13

    Excellent point! More than that, the sample subject populations used in the unidentified surveys evaluated in the unnamed study by unnamed researchers were most likely groups of volunteer undergraduate university students ~20 years old who have little conception of the past or future...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. abrasileirosilva 07:57 PM 3/22/13

    It is a fault of this podcast does not show the link (s) to the research and also other related sources!

    Perhaps the right links can be these:

    http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/03/07/0956797612458804

    http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/events-in-the-future-seem-closer-than-those-in-the-past.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. jtdwyer in reply to abrasileirosilva 08:28 PM 3/22/13

    I think you got it - thanks!

    From the press release:
    "From research on spatial perception, we know that people feel closer to objects they are moving toward than those they are moving away from, even if the objects are exactly the same distance away. Because our perceptions of time are grounded in our experiences of space, Caruso and his colleagues hypothesized that the same illusion should influence how we experience time, resulting in what they call a temporal Doppler effect."

    Please - "Doppler effect"!!!

    I think these researchers may have leaped too far in equating an approaching train with Valentine's day, but obviously past events should not demand our attention to the same extent as impending events (an attacking lion, for example)!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. jgrosay 05:19 PM 3/27/13

    Excerpts from the lyrics of two songs: "Let's forget about tomorrow, for tomorrow never comes", "Ya hemos llegado hasta aquí, y no me voy a parar, llevo el tiempo tras de mí, y no me dejo atrapar. Aquí y ahora, es lo que me importa, aquí y ahora, bailando sin parar hasta el fin". The wise comment by Niels Bohr: "It's extremely difficult making predictions, specially about the future". Salut +

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

We Think the Future Is Closer Than the Past

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X