60-Second Mind

What the Experts Still Don't Know

Twenty three world-renowned psychologists write about what they still don't understand about themselves














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

This month the British Psychological Society published the 150th issue of its Research Digest.
 
To celebrate, they asked 23 world-renowned psychologists the following question: What is one nagging thing that you still don’t understand about yourself? A few touched on consciousness. But many wrote about the conundrum of how understanding behavior does nothing to change behavior.
 
For instance, Norbert Schwarz commented on how knowing that gloomy weather affects one’s moods (he did experiments) doesn’t stop him from feeling down on dreary days. And Paul Rozin remarked that even though psychologists know we learn from experience, we continue to be terrible at predicting how we happy we’ll be, how we’ll like something, and even how much work we’ll accomplish. He wrote:
 

“Every night, I bring home a pile of work to do...I’ve been doing this for over 50 years. I always think I will…get through all or most of it, and I almost never get even half done. But I keep expecting to accomplish it all. What a fool I am.”

 

Robert Cialdini and David Buss also mentioned thoughts along similar lines. Cialdini wrote about never learning to balance. He said, “my most nagging error [is] an inability to gauge correctly the point at which the next possible undertaking - or even golden opportunity - should be firmly rejected. Whenever I've allowed one-too-many responsibilities onto my plate, everything has suffered from the overcrowding…I've no longer had the time or patience to plan, think, or toil hard enough to be proud of the resultant work.”

And Buss coins the problem “overcoming irrationality.” He wrote,

One nagging thing that I still don’t understand about myself is why I often succumb to well-documented psychological biases, even though I’m acutely aware of these biases. One example is my failure at…forecasting, such as believing that I will be happy for a long time after some accomplishment, when in fact the happiness dissipates...Another is…misperceiving a woman’s friendliness as sexual interest. A third is undue optimism about how quickly I can complete work projects, despite many years of experience in underestimating the time actually required. One would think that explicit knowledge of these well-documented psychological biases and years of experience with them would allow a person to cognitively override the biases. But they don’t.

So don’t beat yourself up.  The experts may know what to do. But it doesn’t mean they can do it any better than the rest of us.

—Christie Nicholson


7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. johnwnorton 03:02 PM 10/7/09

    Holy Smoke; what a failure of self-examination! The point of the question was to examine the irony of expertise. If you look, you will see that only 4 of the 23 psychologists reported something about themselves that addressed the spirit of the question. Several used the question as an opportunity to state that they did not understand why they were so wonderful. Jerome Kagan does not understand why he is so much smarter than his peers. This question failed to prod self-examination. Rather, it stimulated narcissism. I think that may tell us something about these psychologists.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ramesam 09:57 PM 10/7/09

    Is it not surprising that ancient sages in India (see for example Sankara's commentary on the fourth rule of Brahmasutras) distinguished Knowledge (jnaanam) from Action (karma)? Knowledge dispels ignorance whereas action produces a result.

    The ancients held "Knowledge" to be superior to action because true "Knowledge" immediately frees a man from illusions like mistaking a rope to be a snake or believing ignorantly the world to be real. No more action is required here. But one needs to act only if (s)he is desirous of getting a specific outcome - to go somewhere, to modify a thing or to produce a new thing.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. silvakreuz 12:36 AM 10/8/09

    Knowing something is another thing. Acting on what we know is another story. Just because we know something doesn't mean we SHOULD act on it though we know that sometimes we should. Our personaly will still prevails.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jstarlin1623 01:26 AM 10/12/09

    this is so interesting i never realized that i do this and from listening to this it is apparent we all have some serious issues lol

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Amindibueno 07:05 PM 10/13/09

    interesting topic, but i agree with Paul Rozin that we get a lot of work to do in one night and we never finish. It always happen to me , we never learn. Never give up ( that's true) and nobody will be better that you, you always have to try your best.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. ringo 06:16 AM 10/20/09

    i don't think those psychologists were actually talking sincerely about their concerns and it wastes our time to try to find useful informations in this

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. kelbow 10:51 PM 11/15/09

    the last "thought process" by Buss of overcoming irrationality is probably what every man goes through. They think they can get things done faster than what they really can, they misinterpret a womans friendlyness for sexual interest and briefly being happy about an accomplishment, but as soon as we see others who have accomplished something more or better, that happiness dissipates.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

What the Experts Still Don't Know

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X