60-Second Science

Wind Farmers Go to School on Fish

Designing wind farms with close packing of turbines, based on schooling fish, could greatly increase efficiency, say researchers at a meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics of the American Physical Society. Cynthia Graber reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

The use of wind power continues to soar around the world. In 2008 the U.S. actually surpassed Germany as the world’s top producer of energy from wind. It might seem that there aren’t many improvements to make to what’s essentially a passive technology. But researchers at the California Institute of Technology say the way fish school will help create more efficient designs for wind farms. They presented their research at a meeting of the American Physical Society’s Division of Fluid Dynamics.

When fish swim, they leave little swirling vortices in their wake. By swimming together in a school, they can transfer energy to one another through these vortices. Wind behaves much as a liquid does. So the engineers have taken wind turbines that spin on vertical axes—these are different from the traditional horizontal wind turbine mostly in use today. On a computer, they’ve positioned the turbines close enough together that as one spins, it then directs the wind to its neighbor.

According to the computer model, this design could increase wind farm efficiency a hundredfold. The next step for the researchers is to do a field test, trying out these fish dynamics on dry land.

—Cynthia Graber 

[The above text is an exact transcript of the audio in the podcast.]

 


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. asher 07:44 PM 11/26/09

    actually i benefit a lot from here i'd like to keep on listening those 60 seconds news everyday

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. FurphyMcMurphy 10:40 AM 11/30/09

    Migrating birds fly in formation in order to use lift more efficiently. Would it not be more efficient to build a single wind turbine that contained multiple wind turbines within it? Each could use the other's lift, making each turbine of turbines hundreds of times more efficient, no?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. fuckayou in reply to FurphyMcMurphy 01:15 AM 4/1/10

    furphy that would work except for the fact that turbines dont fly like a bird and thus do not need lift their stationary on the ground

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. hjfast 05:21 AM 4/1/10

    I'd really like to read the actual study. Currently we are getting 35-45% efficiency out of HAWTs. A hundred fold increase (i.e 100x, or even 10x) in efficiency would mean 4500-450% efficiency... 100% = 100/100 or unity. So congratulations on violating physics. I really respect scientific american, but you can't say that something will have 100x the current efficiency. The Betz limit is a mathematical maximum limit for wind turbines. The maximum possible energy capture from wind (ignoring any mechanical losses) is .59 (59%). Please re-read this post.

    In reality HAWTs are, and always will be,more efficient than VAWTs. So I say BS, but if someone can send me the actual study I would love to read it.

    -h

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Wind Farmers Go to School on Fish

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X