60-Second Mind

Brain Images Make Inaccurate Science News Trustworthy

Research published in the April issue of the journal Cognition shows that the colorful brain images created by functional magnetic resonance imaging can give a perceived credibility to an otherwise flawed science news story.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (or fMRI)—the tool that creates a Technicolor map of our brains showing areas that are "lit up" where we experience anger, empathy or even morality—is either thought of as one of the greatest scientific advancements or nothing more than a high-tech phrenology—the theory that personality can be revealed by the positions of bumps in the skull.
Debates aside, the colorful brain images are a media fetish—and they have an impact on how we view news.
A study in the journal Cognition this month shows that the public views news stories as more scientifically sound when accompanied by a flashy brain image.
Researchers presented 156 subjects with news stories based on flawed science. Subjects rated the stories as more credible when accompanied by a colorful brain image as opposed to a bar graph, a colorful topographic map or no graphic at all.
The results remind us of a study done at Yale, where researchers found that gratuitous neuroscience jargon led nonexperts to believe that a story was more credible than the same story without the jargon.
So take note: When reading the news, may we never lose our skepticism.

60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

Share this Article:


You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

Starting Thanksgiving

Enter code: HOLIDAY 2015
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >


Email this Article