New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry

The 2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry goes to Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich, Aziz Sancar for mechanistic studies of DNA repair

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“This year’s prize is about the cell’s toolbox for repairing DNA.” Göran Hansson, secretary general of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences at about 5:50 A.M. Eastern time.

“The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry jointly to Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich and Aziz Sancar for mechanistic studies of DNA repair.”

Tomas Lindahl is at the Francis Crick Institute and Clare Hall Laboratory in the U.K. Paul Modrich is at the Duke University School of Medicine. And Aziz Sancar is at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Damages occur to your DNA every day.” Sara Snogerup Linse is the chair of the Nobel Committee for chemistry. “In fact, right here, right now, if all those errors were left uncorrected, your genetic material would have very little resemblance to the original chromosomes in your very first cell. Life as we know it today is totally dependent on DNA repair mechanisms, as have been revealed in molecular detail by this year’s chemistry laureates.”

Tomas Lindahl showed that DNA, which had been thought to be a stable molecule, would decay quickly without a way to monitor and fix it. He discovered what’s called base excision repair, involving enzymes that get rid of mistakes and prevent mutations.

Paul Modrich showed how cells correct errors that take place during DNA replication, every time a cell divides. This mismatch repair fixes some 99.9 percent of the errors that take place.  

Aziz Sancar worked out what’s known as nucleotide excision repair. If your DNA gets damaged by, for example, UV light, this process junks the broken section of DNA, which allows a piece with the correct sequence to replace it.

“Their findings have enormous consequences. As just one example, they have led to insights—what may go wrong—in conditions such as cancer.”

For an in-depth listen about the 2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, look for the Scientific American Science Talk podcast later today.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe