New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Let 'Em Eat Mud

Pregnant rain forest bats like to lick mud, probably to make sure they get enough minerals in their diets. Some people do too. Chelsea Wald reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's often joked that pregnant women crave pickles and ice cream; well, it seems that pregnant Ecuadorian bats crave salty mud. The soil in the rainforests where these bats live is notoriously poor in minerals. But muddy spots called “mineral licks” are rare exceptions. A team of scientists from Boston and Berlin trapped bats throughout the Ecuadorian rainforest, including at these mineral licks. They found that bats at the licks were overwhelmingly female, and pregnant or nursing.

The bats were probably there to lap up the mud. The researchers think the bats need the minerals to pass on to their young for their growing bones. Fruit-eating bats were more likely to visit the mineral licks than their insect-eating cousins, who get some minerals from their food. Other animals and indigenous people also square their diets with these minerally muds. In fact, they’re sold in Amazonian markets. Writing in the journal “Research Letters in Ecology,” the authors say their muddy discovery could help explain how rainforests can spawn such rich biodiversity with such poor soil.

—Chelsea Wald

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe