No Clowning For Hospitalized Kids

A British study finds that kids in hospitals hate the images of clowns that are often put on ward halls. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Remember the Seinfeld where the lunatic in the clown costume asked Kramer if he was still afraid of clowns?  And Kramer said, “Yeah.”  Well, he’s not the only one.  A study of hospitalized kids in England found that they positively hate clowns, which are often depicted on the walls in children’s wards.  Researchers from the University of Sheffield took the novel approach of actually interviewing children, rather than relying on adult ideas about what kids like.  They spoke to 255 kids between the ages of 4 and 16.  And none of them liked clowns.  

According to the magazine Nursing Standard, one researcher said, “We found that clowns are universally disliked by children. Some found them frightening and unknowable.” Some representative comments from the kids were, “the clowns are scary,” and “they’re kind of creepy, the clowns.”  Yeah.  On the other hand, kids do like images of the Simpsons, Spongebob Squarepants, characters from Monsters Inc. , pictures of local teams and athletes and photos of the local region.  The researchers created a guide to kid-friendlier  hospital environments, at tinyurl.com/ypzofx

—Steve Mirsky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe