No Clowning For Hospitalized Kids
A British study finds that kids in hospitals hate the images of clowns that are often put on ward halls. Steve Mirsky reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Remember the Seinfeld where the lunatic in the clown costume asked Kramer if he was still afraid of clowns? And Kramer said, “Yeah.” Well, he’s not the only one. A study of hospitalized kids in England found that they positively hate clowns, which are often depicted on the walls in children’s wards. Researchers from the University of Sheffield took the novel approach of actually interviewing children, rather than relying on adult ideas about what kids like. They spoke to 255 kids between the ages of 4 and 16. And none of them liked clowns.
According to the magazine Nursing Standard, one researcher said, “We found that clowns are universally disliked by children. Some found them frightening and unknowable.” Some representative comments from the kids were, “the clowns are scary,” and “they’re kind of creepy, the clowns.” Yeah. On the other hand, kids do like images of the Simpsons, Spongebob Squarepants, characters from Monsters Inc. , pictures of local teams and athletes and photos of the local region. The researchers created a guide to kid-friendlier hospital environments, at tinyurl.com/ypzofx
—Steve Mirsky
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
