Allergies May Have Been Bequeathed by Neandertals

Many non-African humans today have genes—which apparently made it into us via Neandertals—that ramp up resistance to pathogens, but bring on allergies, too. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Image Source (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Homo sapiens may dominate Europe and Asia today. But hundreds of thousands of years ago—long before we got there—the land was ruled by our now-extinct cousins, the Neandertals and Denisovans. "One important thing to realize is that, given that Neandertals and Denisovans had lived in Europe and Asia for such an extended time they were probably quite well adapted to the local conditions." Janet Kelso, a computational biologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. "So they were well adapted to the pathogens, to the foods that were available, to the climate."

The invading newcomers probably found themselves less well adapted to the local conditions. So when H. sapiens shacked up with their close evolutionary relatives, it gave them a shot at picking up some advantageous genes.

Kelso and her colleagues hunted modern human genomes for strings of DNA that closely resembled those known to be from Neandertals and Denisovans. And indeed, on human chromosome number four they found a stretch of archaic DNA, 140,000 bases long.

The genomes of many non-African humans today have this sequence, which includes a cluster of genes that code for Toll-like receptors, or TLRs—a type of immune protein that sniffs out pathogens. And it turns out that archaic variants of that gene are associated with lower microbial loads in present-day humans—a trait that may have been quite valuable to our ancestors as they settled new lands. The study appears in the American Journal of Human Genetics. [Dannemann et al, Introgression of Neandertal- and Denisovan-like Haplotypes Contributes to Adaptive Variation in Human Toll-like Receptors]

Problem is, that increased immune vigilance has a side effect: allergies. “Our speculation is that this is some kind of trade-off, right? In the past you needed to resist some kind of pathogen, and the trade-off or sacrifice you have to make for that is some increased responsiveness to nonpathogenic allergens." So next time some of you get the springtime sniffles, blame your distant ancestor—the one with the heavy brow ridge.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe