Are Biodegradeable Plastics Doing More Harm Than Good?

Depends on whether one worries about climate change or persistent plastics in terrestrial and marine ecosystems. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Audio clip from The Graduate: One word, plastics.] Two words: biodegradable plastics. For years now, they've been a buzz phrase in the chemicals industry. After all, nobody likes those plastic bags flitting on tree tops or floating in the ocean, essentially forever.

But a new analysis shows that biodegradable plastics, particularly those that break down fast, are contributing to climate change. Because when disposable utensils made from the plastic called PHBO get to landfills, microbes break them down and make methane, a potent greenhouse gas. The research appears in Environmental Science & Technology.

Some landfills have installed systems to capture that methane and make use of it. After all, methane is perhaps better known as natural gas—a fuel used for everything from home heating to electricity generation. But most landfills don't capture the methane. So the potent greenhouse gas finds its way into the atmosphere, trapping the sun's heat to warm global temperatures.

In essence, the analysis is less a call to shift away from biodegradable plastic and more an appeal to take all factors into account when judging the relative environmental merits of a product. In other words, look at the entire life cyle. Because haste literally makes waste.

—David Biello

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe