B.O. Gives Up Its Stinky Secrets

Staphylococcus hominis is a key perpetrator of body odor—and researchers say selectively interfering with it could make for more effective deodorants. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Body odor. The smell of B.O. is unmistakable. And the culprit behind that signature stench is a molecule called thioalcohol. Our noses are so attuned to it, we can pick up quantities as small as one part per trillion. But here's the mystery: How does that stinky substance get there in the first place?

Well, it turns out bacteria named Staphylococcus hominis is the major perpetrator, along with a few of its relatives. Their genes code for enzymes that snip the molecules in our sweat to pieces—creating the offensive thioalcohols, along with bits of food for the bacteria. Hey, bacteria gotta eat, too, right? 

When innocuous E. coli bacteria were given the genes that our B.O. perpetrators have naturally, they, too, could achieve the stank. These findings were presented at the annual meeting of the Society for General Microbiology, in Birmingham, in the U.K. [Daniel Bawdon et al, Battling body odour: transport and catabolism of malodour precursors by the underarm microbiota]

Not surprisingly, this work was partially funded by Unilever. Because now that we've identified these microbial targets, the researchers say, it might be possible to design more effective deodorants. Which, instead of crippling all underarm bacteria, dispatch only the most dastardly denizens. Smells like profit to me.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe