New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Better Gut Microbiome Census through Computing

Sophisticated computational techniques make it possible to analyze gene samples from all the bacteria in the gut at once to take a census of the species present.

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

In recent years scientists have shown that the microbes that live in our guts play crucial roles in our lives. They’re involved in digestion, obesity, even mood. And a few can cause serious illness. So it would be a good idea to know the identities of the bacteria inside us. And yet, that info has been incomplete.

But now researchers have developed a technique to get a better census of the gut microbiome. And using the new system, the researchers have found that our microorganisms are even more diverse than we knew. The report is in the journal Nature Biotechnology. [Volodymyr Kuleshov et al, Synthetic long-read sequencing reveals intraspecies diversity in the human microbiome]

Currently, researchers analyze microbial diversity by taking a sample they hope includes the different kinds of bacteria in the gut. They then try to identify the different species by looking at their genomes. But they can only do that second-hand, by trying to piece together many short snippets of DNA—which can be confusing and inadequate when dealing with numerous different kinds of bacteria.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So geneticists at Stanford University got together with computer scientists to come up with a new approach. They used sophisticated computational techniques that enabled them to analyze much longer stretches of DNA—which included many genes that would be missed with the older system. For example, when they tested the gut microbiome from a healthy human male the old way, they found 127 different species. The new method applied to the same sample revealed the presence of an additional 51 species.   

The new approach could be particularly important for identifying and understanding disease-causing microbes. "When you assemble the whole genome, you have a really good idea of what pathogenic genes are present.” Michael Snyder, one of the study researchers. “So we think this technology is going to be extremely powerful for understanding the genetic basis of pathogenesis.”

For example, we all harbor benign strains of E. coli bacteria. But other strains can be toxic or even deadly—and they might be hard to investigate because they don’t grow easily in the lab. The new approach could look directly at the toxic strain’s genes to see how they functions. “And of course this will be really powerful then for treating humans in terms of what pathogenic genes might be present in the microorganisms they harbor.”

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe