New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Better Road Signs Could Save Bicycle Riders

Signs that say "Share the Road" with bicycles may have far less influence over motor vehicle driver behavior than would signs saying "Bicycles May Use Full Lane."

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Streets can be a dangerous place for bicycles. In 2013, nearly 750 cyclists were killed in the U.S. from being hit by a car. And of the 48,000 cycling injuries that were reported that year, nearly a third involved a motor vehicle. Now, a new study suggests that signs sporting just five words could help show drivers and bike riders how to share the road. By not saying “share the road.”

In all 50 states, traffic regulations state that bikes should be treated as vehicles, which means that they have the same rights as cars when it comes to using the roads. But those rules are not always clear. Signs that urge motorists to “Share the road” are ambiguous. Cyclists may assume they mean that cars should make room for bikes. But some drivers may think they’re saying that bikes should get out of the way of traffic.

To see how such signs influence how people think about bike riders’ rights, researchers recruited 1,800 volunteers to take a quick survey. Subjects were shown one of four images. Some saw a street with a traditional “share the road” sign; some saw an image of a bicycle painted on the pavement in a shared lane; some saw signs that read “bicycles may use full lane”; and some saw a street with no instructions at all. They then answered some questions about road etiquette.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It turns out that folks who saw the sign explicitly noting that bikes can use the full lane were the most likely to recognize cyclists’ rights to be on the road. And the ambiguous “share the road” suggestion? It had about the same influence on the study subjects as no sign at all. The findings appear in the journal PLoS One. [George Hess and M. Nils Peterson, “Bicycles May Use Full Lane” Signage Communicates U.S. Roadway Rules and Increases Perception of Safety]

So remember, bicycles may indeed use the full lane. And everyone on the road should use their full brain.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe