New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bird Controls Offspring's Gender

A report in the journal Science shows that at least one species of bird, the Gouldian finch, has the capacity to choose the sex of its offspring. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Some people are worried that the more we learn about genetics, the closer we’ll get to a day when we can choose all sorts of characteristics for our babies: eye color, intelligence—and sex. Well, when it comes to sex, finches are a step ahead of us. Researchers in Australia show that female Gouldian finches can select the sex of their offspring. They published their research in the March 20th edition of the journal Science.

Gouldian finches have either red or black colorations on their heads. They choose their mate based on that head color. So researchers played a trick on the animals. They painted the heads of some red males black. Then they mated those seemingly black-headed birds with both red and black females. When the black females thought they were mating with a black male, they produced equal number of baby girl and boy birds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But the red finch females who thought they were mating with an incompatible black-headed male had significantly more baby boys. Researchers say this is probably to reduce investment in what they call ‘inviable females.’ And they had fewer and smaller eggs. Truly a clutch performance.

—Cynthia Graber 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe