Bite Me: The Mutation That Made Corn Kernels Consumable

A single-point mutation in corn's ancestor teosinte got rid of the hard shell that used to encase every kernel 

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nothing says summer like a sweet ear of corn. But that treat would be much harder to eat if it weren’t for a crucial mutation. The change, in just one letter of the DNA code, appears to have cracked the hard casing that covered every kernel in corn’s wild ancestor. That’s according to a study in the journal Genetics. [Huai Wang et al, Evidence That the Origin of Naked Kernels During Maize Domestication Was Caused by a Single Amino Acid Substitution in tga1]

Corn was domesticated from a wild grass called teosinte some 9,000 years ago. But how did our ancestors make maize the agricultural marvel it is today? Seems they selectively propagated plants with a particular mutation—one that made the kernels more accessible to hungry Homo sapiens.

The researchers compared the DNA of 16 varieties of modern corn and 20 types of teosinte. And they found a single, key mutation that is present in modern corn but absent in its wild-grass ancestor. This genetic hiccup disrupts the activity of a protein called tga1.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In teosinte, the tga1 protein directs the formation of a hard shell around every corn kernel. But the modern maize mutation gives tga1 a new set of marching orders. The mutant protein turns the ear inside out, converting the seed cases into a cob that holds all the kernels in place.

When the researchers reversed the effects of the mutant protein, the ancestral seed-case remnants started to reappear.

The results suggest that even minor genetic changes can lead to some pretty tasty developments. You might call it a-maize-ing. But that would be corny.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe