New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Buyer Beware: Getting Gifts For Many Can Hinder Good Gift Decisions

When shopping for multiple people, gift-buyers try to vary the presents, rather than getting the best gift for each recipient. Allie Wilkinson reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Holiday shopping has its fair share of headaches—the crowds, the long lines and, of course, the stress of finding the perfect gift for everyone on your list. But it turns out that shopping for multiple people can make you a less thoughtful gift-giver. That’s according to a study in the Journal of Consumer Research.[Mary Steffel and Robyn A. Le Boeuf, Overindividuation in Gift Giving: Shopping for Multiple Recipients Leads Givers to Choose Unique but Less Preferred Gifts]

Researchers conducted six experiments asking participants to shop for one person or multiple people. The study subjects were told the recipients’ preferences.

When shopping for multiple people, the gift-givers seemed intent on varying the presents, rather than getting the best gift for each recipient. This behavior is called “overindividuation” and arises from the desire to be thoughtful and treat each gift-getter as unique. Even if there was no way for two recipients to find out they got the same gift, the volunteers still varied the presents. Asking them to put special thought into their gifts only exacerbated overindividuation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So how to make sure a gift is a sure-fire hit? The researchers suggest: buy your loved ones what they’d most likely get for themselves

—Allie Wilkinson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe