New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

California Mountain Snowpack Is Flaking Out

With the Sierra Nevada snowpack at historic lows, should policy makers focus on capturing future rain instead of relying on the snow bank? Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

California's been in the grips of a record-setting drought since 2012. But don't just blame a lack of precipitation. "It's nothing exceptional in the context of the last 1,000 years. However—higher temperatures, this is the feature of this drought." 

Soumaya Belmecheri, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona. She and her colleagues used two different sets of historic tree ring records to reconstruct 500 years of climate history: blue oak tree rings as a proxy for winter precipitation, and another set of rings from a variety of trees, as a proxy for winter temperatures. The tree ring data made it possible to model Sierra Nevada snowpack going back to the year 1500. And the researchers found that today's snowpack is just five percent of its average level over the last five centuries. The finding is in the journal Nature Climate Change. [Soumaya Belmecheri et al, Multicentury evaluation of Sierra Nevada snowpack]

Belmecheri says that the decline in snowpack is a big deal in a place like California, with its Mediterranean-like climate. "You can think about it like a water bank that can be used later in the spring and the summer when it melts." But since temperatures don't look to be on a downturn, she says we should not necessarily focus on filling that snow "bank" anymore—perhaps we should just change banks. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Maybe snowpack in the Sierra Nevada will no longer be a reliable source of water. So maybe a system that is more resilient to this type of drought should be thought of and designed and put in place, including maybe changing where the water is captured. If it's going to rain more than snow in the future, maybe we should capture that rain." And tomorrow's rains, she says, may not fall where today's reservoirs are. Something for policymakers in California to think about, if they want to keep their state above water. 

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group. 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe