Cereal Box Characters Look Down at Kids
Tony the Tiger and his kid-friendly cohort tend to gaze downward whereas the Quaker Oats guy stares straight ahead at thee. Karen Hopkin reports
By Karen Hopkin
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
When you walk down the cereal aisle, do you ever get the feeling that Cap’n Crunch is looking at you? Well, that’s just silly. He’s actually looking at your kids. That’s according to a study by Brian Wansink and colleagues at Cornell’s Food and Brand Lab. [Aviva Musicus, Aner Tal and Brian Wansink, Eyes in the Aisles: Why Is Cap’n Crunch Looking Down at My Child?]
The researchers wondered whether the characters on cereal boxes actually make eye contact. And whether that could influence a shopper’s choice of breakfast fare. So they hit the cereal aisle. And they found that kids’ cereals tend to be placed on lower shelves than grownup offerings. What’s more, Tony the Tiger and his kid-friendly pals tend to gaze downward, while the Quaker Oats guy stares straight ahead.
In a second study, adult volunteers were handed a box of Trix. On some boxes, the rabbit looked straight ahead, on others, he gazed away. When asked what they thought of Trix, it seems that folks felt more connected to the brand, and said they preferred that cereal over others, when the rabbit looked them in the eye.
The results, which appear in the Journal of Environment and Behavior, suggest that certain tricks are not just for kids…but maybe for marketers, too.
—Karen Hopkin
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
