New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Contraception Could Prevent 15 Million Unwanted Pregnancies Annually

Fifteen million unwanted pregnancies in 35 low- and middle-income countries could be avoided if women had access to and freedom to use contraception. Cynthia Graber reports     

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It sounds obvious—pregnancies could be avoided by using contraception. But 15 million unwanted pregnancies could be avoided annually in 35 low- and middle-income countries if women did in fact use modern contraception. That’s according to a study in the journal Human Reproduction. [Saverio Bellizzi et al, Underuse of modern methods of contraception: underlying causes and consequent undesired pregnancies in 35 low- and middle-income countries]

Unwanted pregnancy has a wide range of serious consequences. Women may have to stop their education or employment. They might pursue unsafe abortions. And they can face disability, disease and death as a result of the pregnancy.

To determine barriers to the use of contraception, researchers compared surveys and interviews of nearly 13,000 women who became pregnant unintentionally. They compared the data to that from more than a hundred thousand women who were sexually active and did not want to be pregnant.

For women who were sexually active, did not want to be pregnant, but did not use contraception, 37 percent feared health side effects from contraception. Twenty-two percent said they or their partner objected. These issues outweighed cost or availability. Women also underestimated the risks of getting pregnant from unprotected sex.

The World Health Organization’s Howard Sobel is one of the authors of the study. In a press release he says the research shows that health workers need to play a bigger role in educating and reassuring women, along with helping individuals determine the best contraceptive for them. He advises that effective, affordable contraception should be coupled with education about the myths of contraception—and information about the real risks of unintended pregnancies.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe