Dark Matter Shell Saved Wannabe Galaxy
A failed dwarf galaxy called the Smith Cloud apparently survived an ancient collision with the Milky Way because of a protective dark matter cloak. Clara Moskowitz reports
By Clara Moskowitz
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Space
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Dark matter is that mysterious stuff that apparently accounts for some quarter of the mass and energy in the universe. And for one small wannabe-galaxy, dark matter may have been a lifesaver.
It’s called the Smith Cloud. Astronomers think it’s a failed dwarf galaxy that lacked the requisite mass to produce stars. Many millions of years ago the cloud seems to have collided with the Milky Way and passed through the disk of our galaxy. A new computer simulation finds that the cloud should have been ripped to shreds. That it survived is evidence that it’s protected—by a shell of dark matter.
The report will appear in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Matthew Nichols et al, The Smith Cloud and its dark matter halo: Survival of a Galactic disc passage]
That dark matter shell could have insulated the Smith Cloud from the Milky Way’s gravitational forces, which otherwise should have torn Smith apart.
As if its first fender-bender with the Milky Way wasn’t enough, the Smith Cloud is coming back for more. It’s on course to slam into our galaxy again—in about 30 million years. Perhaps future astronomers will note whether its dark matter shroud once again saves the cloud.
—Clara Moskowitz
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
