New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Diaper Material Expands Wee Microscope Views

The absorbent material in disposable diapers can expand tissue samples, making more structure visible under light microscopes. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Think about the tools used by biologists. Perhaps test tubes and microscopes come to mind. But what about diapers? No, it’s not that investigators are too engrossed in their work to take bathroom breaks. Turns out the absorbent material in disposable diapers can be used to physically expand biological specimens, and make them easier to see with a microscope.
 
Researchers at M.I.T. wanted to take a closer look at the connections that form between neurons in an intact brain—close enough so they could see the actual molecules those nerve cells use to interact. That level of detail is beyond the resolution of conventional light microscopes. But what if the structures of interest could somehow be made bigger?
 
That’s where the diapers come in.  
 
Researchers found that they could infuse their tissue samples with acrylate, the super-absorbent stuff in throwaway diapers. The chemical forms a molecular mesh to which the tissue can anchor. Then, when the researchers add water, the acrylate swells. And so does the sample, which makes minute structures more visible. The technique is described in the journal Science. [Fei Chen, Paul W. Tillberg and Edward S. Boyden, Expansion Microscopy]  
 
The researchers have used the acrylate swelling—or Huggies enhancement or even Pampers amplification, if you will—to peer into the brains of mice, fruit flies and zebrafish. Now, whether this nifty nappie maneuver will expand our understanding of life’s smallest cellular mysteries…well, Depends.
 
—Karen Hopkin
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe