Dig This: China Cuts Coal Production

The biggest single source of global warming pollution actually started to shrink in 2014. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China burns a lot of coal. And that means the country digs up a lot of coal. But in 2014, for the first time in the 21st century, China's coal habit shrank.

The country dug up 3.7 billion metric tons of the dirty black rock in 2013. But last year that figure appears to have dropped to 3.5 billion metric tons. And coal imports fell by more than 10 percent.

These developments are part of the country’s new effort against pollution, which includes the cutback on coal burning to help reduce choking soot and smog in China's major cities. But the trend is also thanks to a slowdown in economic growth, including lower demand for steel for the first time in decades, which in turn lessens the need for coal to fire up the furnaces.

It remains too early to tell if this cutback in coal mining is a blip or evidence for the much-anticipated peak in the country's consumption of the most polluting fossil fuel. But it’s a good sign that China is on track to restrain global warming pollution in the next decade or so, as agreed under a lauded deal with the United States—the world's second largest polluter.

The U.S. has seen its coal habit shrink, too, thanks to increased use of natural gas. If the world’s top two polluting nations can permanently cut coal, that’s good news for a heating planet and billions of pairs of lungs.

—David Biello 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe