New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Drones Spy On Birds in Flight

Quadcopters appear to be a relatively benign tool to study the behavior and numbers of wetland birds. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Studying birds for a living might sound like a cool job. But it's not without its logistical challenges, for us landbound animals. "I can remember precisely a location where I had a northern gannet, so a really large bird, breeding on the top of the cliff." 

David Grémillet, a seabird ecologist at the French National Center for Scientific Research. 

"And from the bottom of the cliff I couldn't see what was happening in that nest. I couldn't even see whether the bird was home or not." 

Grémillet says technology offers a simple solution: "A drone carefully flown at high altitude over the colony would have been really helpful." That's right—a drone. Grémillet says scientists and citizens alike are increasingly using drones to approach birds—either for fun or legitimate research. But they’re taking flight without knowing how the aerial robots might affect their avian study subjects. 

So Grémillet and his colleagues hit the zoo, employing a professional drone pilot to fly test runs near mallard ducks [clip: drone study sound] with a 14-inch-diameter quadcopter. They then got permission to repeat the experiment on wild flamingos and greenshanks in the Camargue, a huge wetland in southern France. 

After several hundred flights, the researchers found that the birds didn't seem to care about the drones' color, or approach speed. And the equipment could get as close as 13 feet to the birds without disturbing them—as long as they didn't approach from overhead—an angle associated with predators. The study is in the journal Biology Letters. [Elisabeth Vas et al, Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines]

All these hi-tech tools could be a boon to wildlife ecologists. "But at the same time you always have to assess the impact of the technology you're using on animal welfare." And maybe drone welfare too. Search YouTube and you'll find that birds of prey, like some privacy advocates, perceive drones as a threat—and make the technology crash, literally. [clip: bird attacking drone, motor stopping, and crashing.]

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe