New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Food Pairings Rely on Mouth-Feel

Red wine goes with steak and soda with a burger in part because the astringent feel and the fatty feel balance out in our mouths. Gretchen Cuda Kroen reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Red wine goes with steak, oil with vinegar, coffee with cream. But have you ever wondered why these pairings taste so good together? Researchers at the Monell Chemical Senses Center think they know—and it has little to do with flavor. Instead the scientists think it’s about the way the different foods feel in your mouth.

Astringent foods like wine, vinegar, coffee and tea make your mouth feel dry and rough. But when paired with something fatty, like steak, oil or cream, the slippery feeling balances out the dryness. Researchers say these astringent-fatty pairs are like the yin and yang of the food world, and we eat them together because they create a balance in our mouths. The findings are presented in the journal Current Biology. [Catherine Peyrot des Gachons et al., Opponency of astringent and fat sensations]

The researchers say our natural tendency for seeking balance in our mouths might have benefits for maintaining a diversity of foods in our diet, but it might also have some drawbacks. For example, drinking astringent beverages, like soda, might encourage us to eat fatty foods like hamburgers and French fries. And too much balance in our mouths might create unbalanced waistlines.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Gretchen Cuda Kroen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe